Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access.
anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Henry Craven: "Re: SBS 2003 evaluaton copy upgrade"
- Previous message: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: Mutilple domain names on SBS"
- In reply to: David Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access."
- Next in thread: David Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access."
- Reply: David Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:06:21 -0700
So above the built in firewall I should have another
piece of hardware between the SBS machine and the
internet? If I am allowing access to any ports open on
the web side of the SBS machine via the firewall anyway
how does it help?
Bill
>-----Original Message-----
>> I do not understand why have the second NIC connect to
a
>> hub? Would I be configuring that NIC to be the "local
>> network" and therefore all domain controller type
>> functions will use that NIC? The server already has two
>> NICs and I have a managed switch in the cabinet. So I
can
>> just connect that second NIC to a port in the switch
and
>> just block all outside access to that port. All of the
>> other machines in the cabinet are Server 2003 Web
edition
>> to be used for serving out our networked applications
and
>> web content we offer. They all have dual NICs so I
>> suppose I could configure the second NICs on all
machines
>> to be on an internal network and use some of the
>> functionality of the SBS machine for something. What I
>> don't know at this time, possibly for setting up
network
>> shares of the drives for accesing them via the VPN on
the
>> SBS machine.
>
>
>Blocking all outside access to that port in the switch
would work as well.
>Yes, basically, it would be to configure an "internal
network", so the
>domain controller functionality listens on that NIC, and
SBS configures its
>own firewall to block access from external/Internet
sources to those ports.
>Configuring the second NICs on all the other machines is
an option too, if
>you wanted any of the functionality gained from that.
Up to you really.
>The key thing with SBS is to just make sure there's an
active firewall up
>between it and the main Internet.
>
>David Jones
>SBS Product Team
>
>--
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
>
>
><anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>news:231e501c45e13$e5786a00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >"Bill" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>> message
>> >news:2309d01c45e03$cd44fda0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> >> Are there any issues with using SBS 2003 Standard
for
>> >> remote access ONLY. All of our employees work
remotely
>> >> with broadband connections and right now we use a
POP
>> >> server for mail, a web based calander with way to
many
>> >> logins for scheduling, FTP for doocument transfer
and
>> AIM
>> >> for instant messaging. I would like to replace all
of
>> >> those methods with SBS. I plan on setting up an SBS
>> >> server in a co-location facility and have everyone
>> access
>> >> it via VPN. Are there any issues with this?
>> >
>> >Hi Bill,
>> >
>> >In addition to what others have said, it is extremely
>> important in this
>> >scenario for you to have a properly configured and
>> maintained firewall
>> >between the server and the Internet. Because SBS must
>> be a domain
>> >controller, and the baggage that comes with that, it
>> must have certain ports
>> >listening. Without a firewall, you risk exposing a
>> domain controller
>> >directly to the Internet, which is a major security
risk.
>> >This (the firewall) can be accomplished with a
hardware
>> device, or by using
>> >2 NICs in the server and putting the unused NIC on a
>> dummy hub. There are
>> >additional ways to configure a firewall on the server
>> while using only 1
>> >NIC, but SBS will not configure it as such.
>> >
>> >David Jones
>> >SBS Product Team
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks for all the help guys!
>>
>> Bill
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Henry Craven: "Re: SBS 2003 evaluaton copy upgrade"
- Previous message: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: Mutilple domain names on SBS"
- In reply to: David Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access."
- Next in thread: David Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access."
- Reply: David Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Using SBS 2003 for all remote access."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|