Re: Possible? with SBS2003
From: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\) (crishannanospam_at_computingpossibilities.net)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Windows NT Server 4.5"
- Previous message: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: problem with posting information on CompanyWeb"
- In reply to: Dale: "Possible? with SBS2003"
- Next in thread: Dale: "Re: Possible? with SBS2003"
- Reply: Dale: "Re: Possible? with SBS2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:47:00 -0500
well the question begs to be ask, why??
You would have to add both your lan segments to the lan routing table. You
would almost be better off with a router off your switch for the other
segment
You could then add static routings in SBS
But again, why this segment for such a small group (75 or less)
-- Cris Hanna (SBS-MVP) _____________________ Please only respond in the Newsgroup and not directly to me, so that everyone can share the information "Dale" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:223b101c45ce5$b72814e0$a501280a@phx.gbl... > I have a requirement to have my Local LAN segmented > utilising 2 Nics. There are 3 NIC's total in my server in > the following config: > > Nic1, 192.168.10.10/24, WAN Connection Via H/W Firewall > Nic2, 192.168.11.10/24, LAN Connection No.1 > Nic3, 192.168.12.10/24, LAN Connection No.2 > > During SBS setup I just ignore the LAN2 Nic and follow the > wizards all the way thru. It proceeds a treat. Once all > setup I then enable the LAN2 and the relevant RRAS routing. > > Unfortunately, no devices on LAN2 segment can join or > access any domain functions or "CompanyWeb" pages (Haven't > checked web access yet). Pinging etc shows connections OK. > > Where or what should be changed to allow devices on LAN2 > to be considered "allowed" or part of local network. > > I had this configuration working using Win2K3 enterprise > demo so I am assuming its something the wizards are > autoconfiguring during setup. > > Thanks in advance. > Dale > > >
- Next message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Windows NT Server 4.5"
- Previous message: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: problem with posting information on CompanyWeb"
- In reply to: Dale: "Possible? with SBS2003"
- Next in thread: Dale: "Re: Possible? with SBS2003"
- Reply: Dale: "Re: Possible? with SBS2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|