Re: The myths of SBS
From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] (sbradcpa_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 05/28/04
- Next message: Ferdinand H. Windbichler: "Re: SBS 2003/Exchange - default smtp changes?"
- Previous message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: The myths of SBS"
- In reply to: Wesley Kendall [MSFT]: "Re: The myths of SBS"
- Next in thread: Jeff L: "Re: The myths of SBS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:28:36 -0700
I'll take patch management installed as a budget item over biometric in
my book.
Wesley Kendall [MSFT] wrote:
>>So you have had some experience with strong passwords and their complete
>>failure short of a gadget. The presence of the sticky notes is of course
>>just a SYMPTOM of the failure of IT to SIMPLIFY their computer experience.
>>Generally an easily remembered weak password is MORE secure on the average
>>over smaller installations than strong passwords which are most always
>>FINDABLE.
>>
>>Weak easily remembered fixed passwords or gadgets are the reasonable
>>solution in an environment where the consultant/expert is trying to help
>
> and
>
>>simplify the computer experience for that average non-expert. Trying to
>>tell folks that they should remember a random string of >= 10 chars and
>
> your
>
>>gonna change it every 60 days is the same as telling those folks to find
>>another consultant/expert; they're gonna catch-on to that before long.
>
>
> There are several ways to create easily-remembered strong passwords. One is
> using the passphrase approach. You can take a simple password like your
> dog's name, "lucky" and create an easily-remembered passphrase, "My dog
> Lucky!". Spaces are legitimate in Windows passwords. That easily-remembered
> passphrase is a complex, 13-character password that includes a special
> character and a combination of uppercase and lowercase letters.
>
> The password policy around here is almost rediculous, yet none of us
> complain. We understand the need for security.
>
> Weak passwords are the cause of many hacks and open mail relays. I get at
> least one call a week where someone's username/password combination has
> been compromised and the mail server is sending out mail because a spammer
> can authenticate against the mail server with the stolen credentials.
>
> The bottom line is that a compromised account is an open door. If you can
> justify the cost of implementing smart cards, biometrics, or some other
> technically advanced way of securing the network, go for it. People with
> budgets have to rely on strong passwords as the base defense.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Wesley Kendall
> Small Business Server Product Support
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> Get Secure! http://www.microsoft.com/security
>
> =====================================================
>
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via
> your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit
> from your issue.
>
> =====================================================
>
>
-- http://www.sbslinks.com/really.htm
- Next message: Ferdinand H. Windbichler: "Re: SBS 2003/Exchange - default smtp changes?"
- Previous message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: The myths of SBS"
- In reply to: Wesley Kendall [MSFT]: "Re: The myths of SBS"
- Next in thread: Jeff L: "Re: The myths of SBS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|