Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN
From: Mark Mancini (info_at_NOSPAMmcse2000.com)
Date: 05/17/04
- Next message: Mark Mancini: "Re: Fault Tolerence on SBS2003 Prem."
- Previous message: Mark Mancini: "Re: OMA MIS_5 Error - PocketPC won't sync wirelessly with server"
- In reply to: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN"
- Next in thread: Tony Su: "Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN"
- Reply: Tony Su: "Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 20:23:51 -0400
total agreement with Les. Aside from getting more features and being
cheaper, also more secure.
-- Sincerely, Mark Mancini, CCA, CCNA, Master CIW&CI, CNE 4&5, MCSE+I 4&2000 www.MCSE2000.com www.AppLauncher.com "Les Connor [SBS MVP]" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca> wrote in message news:O0D%23FW3OEHA.2356@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Hi Bill, > > If it were me, I'd put the members server on the lan, and outsource the web > site. Having the memberserver on the lan for all the reasons you mentioned > has benefits, especially as sbs integrated configuration and managment is > all set up to make this easy. > > To host your web site, you could dmz the web server off the pix, and use it > for nothing but that. But I think you'll find that the above scenario gets > you way more bang for the buck, as web hosting is very affordable and the > risk is all somebody elses :-). > > -- > Les Connor [SBS MVP] > ------------------------------------- > SBS Rocks ! > > > > "Bill" <bill@poppyweb.com> wrote in message > news:dNNpc.9391$7W2.3360@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com... > > My network so far looks like this: > > > > DSL > > | > > PIX 501 > > | > > SBS 2003 Standard w/2 NIC > > | > > Internal LAN > > > > I want to add a Windows 2003 webserver to run the public website, but I > > would also like to use it for files sharing and print services on the > > internal LAN. I thought I would dual NIC it with one interface having an > > external IP on the same subnet as the SBS outside interface, and the > second > > interface would have an internal LAN IP statically assigned. I would allow > > port 80 access to the outside interface of the Windows 2003 server through > > the PIX. The windows 2003 member server would not have any domain > > information, etc. > > > > Is this configuration valid? What are the Security implications? Could I > > also run terminal services on this same server so internal users could > share > > an application where the data store would be on the SBS server? > > > > > > > > -- > > ~~ To give a person an opinion one must first judge well whether that > > person is of the disposition to receive it or not. > > > > > >
- Next message: Mark Mancini: "Re: Fault Tolerence on SBS2003 Prem."
- Previous message: Mark Mancini: "Re: OMA MIS_5 Error - PocketPC won't sync wirelessly with server"
- In reply to: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN"
- Next in thread: Tony Su: "Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN"
- Reply: Tony Su: "Re: Member Server with Interface in Permiter Network and also interface on internal LAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|