Re: Keeping logins secure, Smart Cards?

From: Mark Mancini (info_at_NOSPAMmcse2000.com)
Date: 05/14/04 

Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:28:21 -0400

1 thing about smart cards.....get the 3rd party authentication s/w they sell
instead of trying to do it yourself in 2003!!!! It will save you much time! 

-- 
Sincerely,
Mark Mancini, CCA, CCNA, Master CIW&CI, CNE 4&5, MCSE+I 4&2000
www.MCSE2000.com
www.AppLauncher.com
"Gary V." <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:d09201c43966$d1f1aae0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> Some background info, we have a pricing system that sits
> in a warehouse full of "court appointed worker" and they
> touch a picture of the item and out pops a price tag.
> They are not employees but we do have supervisors how are
> in all departments.
>
> Anyways those terminals well be locked down but what
> about login? The user name would be the department but I
> don't want the supervisors to have to remember the long
> passwords and for added security there are no keyboards
> or mice just touch panel monitors. So login is even
> harder. So I was thinking auto login via Tweak XP or
> smart cards that the supervisors would have around there
> neck.
>
> 1st what do you guys think would be the most secure auto
> login or smart cards?
> 2nd say a sup logs one terminal in and then another with
> the same card, can you login same user at the same time?
> If not would I have to go to a department smart card you
> think?
> 3rd never used smart cards and I assume sbs 2003 can use
> them but security wise are they better (more secure) then
> manual login?
> 4th how are your favorite venders for smart cards?
>
> Thanks for your help, suggestions, or your scenarios.
>

Relevant Pages

  • Keeping logins secure, Smart Cards?
    ... They are not employees but we do have supervisors how are ... So login is even ... smart cards that the supervisors would have around there ... 1st what do you guys think would be the most secure auto ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Keeping logins secure, Smart Cards?
    ... Conclusion smart is more secure without any doubt. ... You can limit 2 login per user ... some procedure for lost or stolen smart cards. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Smart card is required for interactive logon
    ... | I have several users that logon without smart cards on a daily basis. ... | users that are required to login with smart cards. ... One where you use cryptographic logon enforcement through group policy management. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Smartcard User and Windows Password
    ... the "Require Smartcard for login" is not checked on the users account. ... This all leads to the question of things like OWA. ... in which case how valuable are the smart cards. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.security)