Re: Inplace Upgrades, continued...

From: Frank McCallister (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/08/04 

Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 21:12:53 -0700

I am totally confused now! You said this was an In place
upgrade and yet you say you can log in to the old 2k
network. That sounds more like a Migration than an in
place on the same server which is a totally different
scenario.

Frank
>-----Original Message-----
>Frank,
>Don't think it's the quota issue, some of the shared
folders are less than
>1Gb.What happens is this - from my XP workstation, I
can't even logon to the
>SBS2K3 server unless I first rejoin the old SBS2K
network, logoff, switch
>servers, then I can logon. During this phase I can access
the web,
>send/receive mail - but while I can see shared resources,
I can't print, or
>open folders - I get the "access denied" window. If I
try and map a drive
>from a DOS box on the workstation, I'm prompted for
credentials - then I'm
>denied access - even to the Sys Admin. I get "System
Error 5 - Access
>Denied". If I then logoff, I can't log back
on... "network error has
>ocurred."
>Actually, I think it's time to consign this experiment to
the Big Bit Bin in
>the Sky - feel I've wasted too much of everyone's time
here!
>Anyway Frank, Thanks for persevering.
>Norm Hughes
>
>"Frank McCallister" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message
>news:a1e701c434a0$194c9ec0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
>> Hi NH
>>
>> When you say No access to shares describe what you mean.
>> Can they see the shares but not write to them or can
they
>> not even browse to the Company folder. If it is that
they
>> can't write to them the problem is that SBS2k3 has a
>> default Quota of 1GB for users on Shares. If in the SBS
>> 2000 server they were already past that then their limit
>> needs to be raised.
>>
>> Frank
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Hi Frank
>> >Yes, I did run the Migrate Users task - I did
>> everything "by the book!"
>> >Thanks for your input - I think the rest of the group
>> have given up on this
>> >one!
>> >Cheers
>> >NH
>> >
>> >"Frank mcCallister"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> wrote in message
>> >news:9e7f01c43489$b4566020$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I am poking my nose in where it probably doesn't
belong
>> >> because I don't know the background and this may be
an
>> >> offensive and stupid question, but did yo run the
>> Migrate
>> >> users wizard refered to in the Getting started guide
for
>> >> in place upgrade on page 32.
>> >>
>> >> Management Tasks
>> >> Important
>> >> If you do not complete this task, some features may
not
>> be
>> >> available to your users.
>> >> If users currently have permission to access the
local
>> >> network remotely, you must assign users to the Mobile
>> >> Users security group for them to continue to have the
>> >> necessary permissions. To do so, complete the Migrate
>> >> Users task.
>> >> . Migrate Users. Complete this task to update user
>> >> accounts from the templates used in Small Business
>> Server
>> >> 2000 to the templates used in Windows Small Business
>> >> Server 2003. Clicking this task starts the Change
User
>> >> Permissions Wizard.
>> >>
>> >> Frank McCallister
>> >> COMPUMAC
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >SIGH...
>> >> >Sob. So Ray Fong won't/can't reply. There was
>> another
>> >> NG thread which
>> >> >waqs instigated by Kevin Weilbacher, are you there?
>> Not
>> >> that you're
>> >> >second-best Kevin... it's just that my problem
seemed
>> to
>> >> fit that
>> >> >described by Ray Fong ( see unanswered thread, 3
May) a
>> >> little more closely.
>> >> >Anyway, Earlier in the year you initiated a series
of
>> >> posts regarding your
>> >> >experiences with inplace upgrades of SBS 2k to
SBS2K3 -
>> >> most were to do with
>> >> >workstations accessing server shares after the
upgrade.
>> >> The thread
>> >> >concluded with no apparent conclusions nor
resolutions.
>> >> Kevin -what did you
>> >> >do to resolve this issue - if anything? At present
we
>> >> have a client on hold
>> >> >(rolled back to SBS2k) because the inplace upgrade
>> >> failed - web, mail, news
>> >> >OK, but no access to server shares! Failing any
>> >> responses, next step is to
>> >> >place all inplace upgrades on hold till SP1?
>> >> >Regards,
>> >> >Norm Hughes
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >.
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Upgrade w2k
    ... will make new server with same SIDs, GUIDs, server names, IP addresses ... This can cause conflicts on the network... ... Now you take it offline and bring on the network another clone of this ... take it away from user's network and upgrade it. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Cant Map Drive over VPN to Win2K Server but can to desktops
    ... Seems there are various threads on mapping drives over VPN but none ... I have set up a VPN to the network at my office ... I can connect to shares on the ... The Server is Win2k Small Business Server and is configured as the ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Strange Connection Issues with Win2003 Server & XP Client
    ... System Error 53 Has Occured - The network path was not found - this was ... I can ping the server, I can "net view" & "net view server" the server ... shares, but not the actual shares, I get the same messages as above. ... workstation on the same network, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Network Path Not found
    ... "Chuck" wrote: ... "Network Path not found" error. ... From my other systems I can access the shares on the bad computer with no ... Hybrid, and a WINS server defined, a computer will ask the WINS server for an ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Sysvol issues.....
    ... network shares created on DC1. ... access the SYSVOL and Netlogon default shares. ... error when accessing the share by typing its path with server name. ... even form the DC1 server itself when logged on by the console. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)