Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?
From: root (postmaster_at_buchanangc.com)
Date: 05/07/04
- Next message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: SBS2003 ICW will not run"
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: DCPROMO"
- In reply to: Rick: "Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?"
- Next in thread: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:23:33 -0700
"Rick" <nospam7@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:%23m6hV3FNEHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Javier, thank you for your response.
>
> You say "just put the number on to of the CAL..." Is this in the Licensing
> section? I have done that and the system shows 30 CALs.
>
> But I'm still not clear on the concept. Does the server enforce the 30
> number in some way or is this a "moral" obligation?
Moral.
> You say that a User CAL
> is assigned to a specific user. At what point?
Your pen stroke.
> When they are created in AD?
> When they logon? How are they assigned?
In your "moral" mind and/or notes and not in any code in SBS2003.
- Next message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: SBS2003 ICW will not run"
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: DCPROMO"
- In reply to: Rick: "Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?"
- Next in thread: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS2003 - mixing CALS?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|