Re: Open letter to Trend Micro

From: Mark (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/06/04


Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 13:55:42 -0700

Now it's my turn to disagree with you, I only had this
issue on one system and only had the reboot issue on one,
two others didn't have the reboot issue and two don't
have the e-mail problem (not the same two).

If it was a consistent across the board issue I could see
you being annoyed but when things are erratic how are
they to know?

>-----Original Message-----
>Gotta disagree with you, Les. I'm not upset with the
fact that we have to
>spend money on Trend's software to deal with the spam
problem. I'm upset by
>the fact that Trend's software is causing its own set of
problems. And since
>both the reboot problem and the performance report
quarantine problem seem
>to affect all SBS03 users, I would think that Trend
could have prevented
>these problems through better testing in their own shop.
And it's not like
>these updates had to be rushed out the door in response
to new threats like
>Sasser. So what's the excuse?
>
>Is Trend the only software manufacturer to release buggy
software? We all
>know the answer to that one. But I think they could do a
better job, and
>they could certainly do better in terms of tech support.
(How 'bout a
>monitored newsgroup like this one, for example?)
>
>"Les Connor [SBS MVP]" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca> wrote
in message
>news:uBrf6O6MEHA.2676@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> David,
>>
>> I hear your frustration. But ....
>>
>> The problem is not Trend, the problem lies with those
who spam (and
>> manufacture malware), and with those who don't take
reasonable precautions
>> to prevent aiding the spammers. Our problem, A/V
manufacturers opportunity
>> ;-).
>>
>> FWIW, you'll have a difficult time beating the
protection C/S/M offers at
>> the price. Those with no spam control won't have the
occasional false
>> positive. Just a whole lot of spam.
>>
>> --
>> Les Connor [SBS MVP]
>> -------------------------------------
>> SBS Rocks !
>>
>>
>>
>> "David Schrag" <david-no-spam@schrag.net> wrote in
message
>> news:%23vgBFn5MEHA.3312@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> > Could you folks please improve your testing regimen
for C/S/M - SMB
>> updates,
>> > specifically on SBS03 servers? A month ago your
update caused
>spontaneous
>> > server reboots, and now an update to eManager is
quarantining our server
>> > performance reports. You have a lot of fans in the
SBS community ... but
>> if
>> > this keeps up you're likely to lose a bunch of them.
Who knows ... you
>> might
>> > even lose your MS Gold Certified Partner status.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How workable is Vista?
    ... clicks almost the moment it boots up; I don't have to wait for all the startup applications to finish before I can get responses to anything I do. ... The main reason NT 3.51 was more reliable and stable than any windows version before or since is that the gui and drivers were in user space, ... There is no practical need to do updates to the original versions. ... In the most of cases you can continue safely without reboot even if they required it. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: How workable is Vista?
    ... reliable and stable than any windows version before or since is that the gui and drivers were in user space, ... There is no practical need to do updates to the original versions. ... In the most of cases you can continue safely without reboot even if they required it. ... unless a double/triple redundant system is ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Installing New Windows Defender Updates
    ... I know that if the updates say "Restart required" that any kind of reboot is sufficient. ... I want to install without shutting down the ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • Re: PLEASE stop nagging us to reboot!!!!
    ... Jon Davis wrote: ... PLEASE stop nagging us to reboot!! ... Quit assuming that YOUR updates are more ... control over the process - choosing WHEN to install them and thus - ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • Re: Complaint about update system
    ... Allow the user to postpone a reboot after a Windows ... should also be noted that this automatic installation is done at a specified ... Change Automatic Updates back to Option ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)