Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients
From: Les Connor [SBS MVP] (les.connor_at_DEL.cfive.ca)
Date: 04/26/04
- Next message: Jeff L: "Re: Partitions/Drives for SBS2003??"
- Previous message: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: OT: Moved to new Internet access"
- In reply to: Jim Behning SBS MVP: "Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients"
- Next in thread: Geoff Davis: "Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients"
- Reply: Geoff Davis: "Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:47:47 -0500
In addition to Jim's suggestion - create a new exchange profile for that
user on the workstation. That seems to fix a lot of outlook problems.
To determine whether it's a workstation problem or a user problem, log on as
another user and see if the outlook behaviour is still the same.
-- Les Connor [SBS MVP] ------------------------------------- SBS Rocks ! "Jim Behning SBS MVP" <jimbehingmvp@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:sr0o80hj6vullbquetu18nfpfch4bcrbih@4ax.com... > ipconfig/all from problem workstation. Make sure wins and dns are > pointing to the internal ip of server. I have had frustrations when > old workstations had manual entries for wins and dns. > > BLDSupport@woodandco.co.uk (Geoff Davis) wrote: > > >Les > > > >Implemented Network change as sugested and everything works OK, > >except that on one Win98SE client Outlook 2000 takes a long time to > >hook up to the User mail box. Once hooked up response times seem Ok. > >There are no speed problems when accessing the Internet etc. > > > >I have installed the DSClients Hot Fix from MS but this has made no > >difference. All other Win98SE clients have no problems. > > > >Regards > > > >Geoff Davis > > > > > >"Les Connor [SBS MVP]" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca> wrote in message news:<#cWWJrHKEHA.2244@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>... > >> typo - you have it right. > >> > >> Yes, the example is valid for two nic setup irregardless of what of software > >> firewall you implement. > >> > >> -- > >> Les Connor [SBS MVP] > >> ------------------------------------- > >> SBS Rocks ! > >> > >> > >> > >> "Geoff Davis" <BLDSupport@woodandco.co.uk> wrote in message > >> news:9057bc55.0404220502.4e86fa1@posting.google.com... > >> > Les > >> > > >> > Thanks again for your response. > >> > > >> > I will implement the changes (or similar) you recommend as soon as I > >> > can take the Server/Internet Offline, hopefully this weekend. > >> > > >> > I assumme this sample setup is applicable whether or not ISA is > >> > implmeneted or not? > >> > > >> > Just one thing, I think it must be a typo. The DG for the WAN NIC in > >> > your reply is 192.167.1.1, I assumme it should be 192.168.1.1 to match > >> > the Router Internal IP? > >> > > >> > Thanks again > >> > > >> > Geoff > >> > > >> > > >> > "Les Connor [SBS MVP]" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca> wrote in message > >> news:<Ov957b6JEHA.2380@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>... > >> > > Hi Geoff, > >> > > > >> > > >Router IP is 10.0.0.50, NIC for > >> > > >Router IP: 10.0.0.60, Server NIC IP 10.0.0.1, Clients get their IPs > >> > > >from server DHCP in the scope 10.0.0.100 to 10.0.0.255 > >> > > > >> > > Everything is on the same 10.0.0.x address. Neither ISA nor Basic > >> Firewall > >> > > can do it's job. > >> > > > >> > > You want it to look like this: (example). Note that the LAN and WAN are > >> on > >> > > different subnets, so there is no traffic passed between them. This is > >> where > >> > > ISA or Basic Firewall logically sits - between these subnets. You > >> configure > >> > > ISA or Basic Firewall via CIECW, to filter (allow) only what you want to > >> > > allow. > >> > > > >> > > Server NIC (Lan) > >> > > IP: 10.0.0.1 > >> > > SN: 255.255.255.0 > >> > > DNS: 10.0.0.1 > >> > > DG: <empty> > >> > > > >> > > DHCP is bound to the Lan nic, all client machines get addy's in the > >> 10.0.0.x > >> > > range. This nic is connected to your switch/hub. > >> > > > >> > > Server NIC (WAN) > >> > > IP: 192.168.1.2 > >> > > SN: 255.255.255.0 > >> > > DNS: 10.0.0.1 > >> > > DG: 192.167.1.1 > >> > > > >> > > WAN nic is connected to your router. > >> > > > >> > > Router (Internal) > >> > > IP: 192.168.1.1 > >> > > SN: 255.255.255.0 > >> > > > >> > > Your router is set to forward ports you need open to your WAN nic. > >> > > > >> > > The link I gave you says all. If you want a picture, go to > >> > > http://www.smallbizserver.net and click on the networking link. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Les Connor [SBS MVP] > >> > > ------------------------------------- > >> > > SBS Rocks ! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > "Geoff Davis" <BLDSupport@woodandco.co.uk> wrote in message > >> > > news:9057bc55.0404210120.718129f5@posting.google.com... > >> > > > Les > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks very much for the advice. Your answer has raised a further > >> > > > question but first of all I should tell you that I managed to solve > >> > > > the problem. I found that the "Proxy Client" software required for > >> > > > the SBS4.5 was still installed on the two problematic PCs and that > >> > > > uninstalling it was the solution. > >> > > > > >> > > > Back to your response. I am keen that, although everything seems to > >> > > > be working Ok, the Server is set up correctly to avoid any future > >> > > > problems. When you say that the internal and external networks should > >> > > > be seperated, do you mean Subnet wise?. I'm afraid that my experience > >> > > > is a bit limited at the moment (but growing exponentially). I used > >> > > > the CEICW to set up the connection and reading MKBA825763 it doesnt > >> > > > seem to indicate seperating networks. I will trawl through the Help > >> > > > and see what I can find but if you have the time I would very much > >> > > > appreciate any help/pointers that you (or anybody else for that > >> > > > matter) can give. > >> > > > > >> > > > Regards > >> > > > > >> > > > Geoff Davis > >> > > > > >> > > > "Les Connor [SBS MVP]" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca> wrote in message > >> news:<OiobhojJEHA.2412@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>... > >> > > > > Hi Geoff, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Your network configuration is not valid. Your internal and external > >> networks > >> > > > > must be separated. You can get information from within the SBS help > >> file, or > >> > > > > here: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > More information: > >> > > > > 825763 How to configure Internet access in Windows Small Business > >> Server > >> > > > > 2003 > >> > > > > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=825763 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Les Connor [SBS MVP] > >> > > > > ------------------------------------- > >> > > > > SBS Rocks ! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > "Geoff Davis" <BLDSupport@woodandco.co.uk> wrote in message > >> > > > > news:9057bc55.0404190932.1b5d0482@posting.google.com... > >> > > > > > Help Required Please > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I have just upgraded a small ofice network as follows: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Was: > >> > > > > > Server SBS 4.5, Clients: 1 x Win95C, 10 x Win98SE, 4 x Win2000 > >> prof. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Now: > >> > > > > > Did not upgrade the original server but installed brand new DELL > >> 2600 > >> > > > > > Poweredge running SBS 2003 premium. There are two Network cards, > >> one > >> > > > > > for internal LAN and one dedicated to a Zoom X4 Router/Firewall > >> for an > >> > > > > > ADSL connection to the internet. Router IP is 10.0.0.50, NIC for > >> > > > > > Router IP: 10.0.0.60, Server NIC IP 10.0.0.1, Clients get their > >> IPs > >> > > > > > from server DHCP in the scope 10.0.0.100 to 10.0.0.255 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > We did not migrate the accounts from the old server but started > >> with a > >> > > > > > clean *** and set up new accounts. The configurations on the > >> > > > > > Win98SE and the Win95C clients were changed manually following the > >> > > > > > instructions in SB2003 help file and this user group. I have set > >> up > >> > > > > > to use DCHP on the server and have used WinIPCfg on all the > >> clients to > >> > > > > > realease and renew their IP addresses. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Everything went suprisingly smoothly; all Win98SE clients, except > >> two, > >> > > > > > are operating perfectly. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Each of the faulty clients are exhibiting the same 2 problems: > >> > > > > > 1) They refuse to access the Internet but will access the > >> > > > > > 'CompanyWeb'. > >> > > > > > 2) When Outlook 2000 starts it thinks about it for some time (I > >> > > > > > assumme the time out of 30 secs) and then displays a dialog box > >> > > > > > "Exchange Server Unavailable" and offer the following 3 options; > >> > > > > > Retry, Work Offline or Cancel. On one PC clicking Retry will > >> > > > > > immediately open the mailbox from the server. On the other PC it > >> only > >> > > > > > responds after going through the Retry process 2 or 3 times. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > These two machines seem to have no problems browing the internal > >> > > > > > network and can 'see' all other clients on the Network. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > We have a various mixture of client PCs, mainly Gateway & Dell > >> > > > > > purchased over the last three or four years. The two faulty PCs > >> are > >> > > > > > not the same hardware and they have different Network cards. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > All the IP address details and Network/IP configurations are the > >> same > >> > > > > > on all Client PCs i.e. everything obtained from DHCP. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I've tried removing the Network Card (from the Device Manager) and > >> > > > > > reinstalling it to no avail. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > It hair-tearing time, can anybody help prevent an old, and rapidly > >> > > > > > getting older by the minute, man going insane. All suggestions > >> > > > > > greatly appreciated. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Geoff Davis > > Jim B. SBS MVP > remove the mvp to send email
- Next message: Jeff L: "Re: Partitions/Drives for SBS2003??"
- Previous message: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: OT: Moved to new Internet access"
- In reply to: Jim Behning SBS MVP: "Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients"
- Next in thread: Geoff Davis: "Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients"
- Reply: Geoff Davis: "Re: SBS 2003 - No Internet Access/Outlook 2000 slow from Some Win98 Clients"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]