NDRs for internal clients only?
From: Jon Ogden (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: Aviciti Tech in Training #2: "Re: expanding SBS / or wishing it fair well?"
- Previous message: Andrew H: "Re: SBS2003 - remote access with only static IP, no DNS registration"
- In reply to: M Callinan: "NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Next in thread: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Reply: M Callinan: "Re: NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:41:25 -0800
In Exchange System Manager go to the global settings
folder and then select properties of Message Delivery.
There is a tab in there called Sender Filtering. There's
a checkbox that says, "Accept Messages Without Notifiying
Sender of Filtering." But I think that only works on
specific senders you put in that box.
However, sending an NDR to the e-mail address provided
in a spam message generally won't do anything. The e-
mail addresses that are used are rarely valid addresses
but are rather spoofed or forged. So the NDR gets sent
to the forged e-mail server and has no where to go......
The other alternative is to get a spam firewall that is
external to your exchange server and just blocks the
messages. Barracuda Networks makes several excellent
products (easiest product I've ever deployed on my
network). They work absolutely phenomenally.
IMHO, you want NDRs sent to people from the outside who
try to send you a valid message yet get the name or
address wrong.
Jon
>-----Original Message-----
>Can Exchange 2k3 be configured to deliver NDRs for mail
being sent out of
>the server, but not for mail coming into the server?
People at the office
>find the messages useful to let them know when they
mistype an address or
>send an attachment that's over the size limit of the
external receiving
>server. At the same time, sending NDRs for incoming
spam is not desired.
>If not possible now, this would be a good addition for a
future release.
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Aviciti Tech in Training #2: "Re: expanding SBS / or wishing it fair well?"
- Previous message: Andrew H: "Re: SBS2003 - remote access with only static IP, no DNS registration"
- In reply to: M Callinan: "NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Next in thread: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Reply: M Callinan: "Re: NDRs for internal clients only?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|