Re: Shared folders not seen
From: Mike DeLong (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: Henry Craven: "Re: Pop3 Connector"
- Previous message: Dana Becker [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange Logs"
- Next in thread: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: Shared folders not seen"
- Reply: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: Shared folders not seen"
- Reply: Jim Behning SBS MVP: "Re: Shared folders not seen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:34:26 -0800
Right - there is a users folder on the C: drive. I
followed many people's advice and made the c: drive
smaller for the OS, and made the d: drive the big one for
data and programs. Unfortunately, sbs didn't give me an
option as to where the default users folders should be -
they went on c: drive. Also, all the exchange data are on
the c: drive. So I wish I hadn't followed that advice.
The whole reason I made the big d: drive was to put that
kind of stuff there.
So I'm putting users' folders on the d: drive. But
although the win98 clients can see their default folder on
c: fine, I'm having trouble finding them and mapping them
when I put them on d: drive.
>-----Original Message-----
>You are seeing shares on the server which can also
include printers.
>There is a folder called users created in a standard SBS
install. What
>happened to that folder? You can put a folder on the D:
drive and
>share it or on the E: drive and share it. You can share a
folder three
>subfolders deep if you like anywhere on the server and it
should show
>up. In SBS2000 Client apps was a subfolder share that
everyone could
>see.
>
>"Mike DeLong" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>When I access our server (\\servername), am I accessing
>>the computer or the c: drive?
>>
>>Are all the folders I see on \\servername shares?
>>
>>Where should I put windows 98 client user folders? Does
>>this mean that the folder has to be on the c: drive, and
>>not in a subfolder?
>>
>>What I want to do is put a folder in the d: drive called
>>user folders, and put user folders in them.
>>
>>Is the fact that I have shared the d: drive so I can see
>>it (calling it data) making it impossible to share
folders
>>in it?
>>
>>Finally, is there a way to see the d: drive without
using
>>sharing?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>Windows 98 cannot map to a subfolder in a share. That
>>capability started
>>>with Windows 2000.
>>>
>>>Network Neighborhood is sometimes flaky and
connectivity
>>has no dependency
>>>on it.
>>>You can a UNC path from the run command to find shares.
>>> \\server\sharename
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mike DeLong" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote
>>in message
>>>news:1556f01c415f8$f8825420$a501280a@phx.gbl...
>>>>I have a d: drive partition with folders I want to
share.
>>>> I made a folder called cw server, set permissions
>>>> to "everyone," and all my clients can see it. I then
>>>> created another folder called shared files, with the
>>exact
>>>> same permissions. Using network neighborhood, I can
see
>>>> both folders from the sbs2003 server. Going to a
win98
>>>> client, though, I can only see the "cw server"
folder,
>>and
>>>> not the "shared files" folder.
>>>>
>>>> Any idea why this is happening?
>>>>
>>>> Related question: why can I map some drives on the
win98
>>>> maching and not others? I right-click on some
folders,
>>>> and "map network drive" appears. I drill down a
little
>>>> into the file structure, right-click on a folder, and
no
>>>> mapping option appears.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>
>Jim B. SBS MVP
>remove the mvp to send email
>.
>
- Next message: Henry Craven: "Re: Pop3 Connector"
- Previous message: Dana Becker [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange Logs"
- Next in thread: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: Shared folders not seen"
- Reply: Les Connor [SBS MVP]: "Re: Shared folders not seen"
- Reply: Jim Behning SBS MVP: "Re: Shared folders not seen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|