Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall
From: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP] (kweilbacMVP_at_gte.net)
Date: 03/21/04
- Next message: Dirk-Thomas Brown: "Re: Remote Desktop Connection Error"
- Previous message: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]: "Re: >>> SBS 2003 5 CAL FREE OFFER UPDATE <<<"
- In reply to: Steven Banks [SBS MVP]: "Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall"
- Reply: John: "Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:25:27 -0500
Steven, I have setup two SBS2003 systems, with SSL Certificate defined, and
neither will allow me to use http://fqdn/remote remotely ... I must use
https://fqdn/remote
-- Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP] "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long" "Steven Banks [SBS MVP]" <steve@newsonline.banksnw.com> wrote in message news:OdW2aXxDEHA.548@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > John, > > By design, when you type in http://fqdn/remote it should connect and > immediately switch to https://fqdn/remote. Is this happening for you? If > not, ensure port 443 is enabled as the SSL port for the default Website and > that you have your server's cert showing under the Directory Security > Properties of Remote. If it is still not switching to SSL, then re-run the > CEICW. > > To answer your first question, If port 80 is really bugging you, you can > always take it out. If your server is patched up to date and running > current AV software and is behind your firewall, your exposure on port 80 is > a low risk in my opinion. If you don't patch and keep current AV software > running, then you'll be hit over port 25 from email based worm/virus attacks > long before port 80 becomes an issue most likely. > > Steve > > -- > Banks Consulting Northwest > http://www.banksnw.com > > > "John" <jk@rt.com> wrote in message > news:OqCdyhwDEHA.2908@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > I am running SBS2003 standard with a dual NIC configuration and Linksys > firewall. I do NOT have the root setup to publish a website. I have found > that if I have port 80 forwarded to my WAN nic I am able to access RWW by > typing fqdn/remote instead of https://fqdn/remote. I have closed the port > for now but am curious if this is a bad idea just to gain some convenience. > > TIA > > John > > > >
- Next message: Dirk-Thomas Brown: "Re: Remote Desktop Connection Error"
- Previous message: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]: "Re: >>> SBS 2003 5 CAL FREE OFFER UPDATE <<<"
- In reply to: Steven Banks [SBS MVP]: "Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall"
- Reply: John: "Re: Danger to having Port 80 open on hardware firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|