Re: SBS vs. individual components
From: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP] (javier_gomez_at_remove.this.engineer.com)
Date: 02/24/04
- Next message: Ray Fong [MSFT]: "RE: Error log: W3SVC-WP"
- Previous message: Horace: "Re: SBS 2k3 NTBackup problem"
- In reply to: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Next in thread: Stan: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Reply: Stan: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Reply: Stan: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:24:01 -0500
I forgot to say... that you can still use RWW to remotely administer the
server.
-- Javier [SBS MVP] << SBS ROCKS !!! >> "Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]" <javier_gomez@remove.this.engineer.com> wrote in message news:eKX%230um%23DHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > In my opinion-> RWW will not be that useful in that scenario... because you > don't have local workstations. What RWW allows you is to access your > workstation from anywhere in the world with an internet connection and a > browser. Have you ever seen GoToMyPC? Similar principle. > > RWW is useful when an user has a workstation and travels a lot... from any > browser on the intenet he/she can access his/her workstation (and any > programs on it). > > Can I ask you a question-> What your clients need to access on the server? > (i.e. mail, files, accounting app?) > > -- > Javier [SBS MVP] > > << SBS ROCKS !!! >> > > "Stan" <Stan@PreventSpam> wrote in message > news:eUBt7mm%23DHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > Thanks. I guess I don't fully understand what RWW is. For an environment > > with a stand-alone server, with most/all of the users connecting from > their > > remote offices via a laptop--no local PCs on the LAN with the server--is > RWW > > still useful? > >
- Next message: Ray Fong [MSFT]: "RE: Error log: W3SVC-WP"
- Previous message: Horace: "Re: SBS 2k3 NTBackup problem"
- In reply to: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Next in thread: Stan: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Reply: Stan: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Reply: Stan: "Re: SBS vs. individual components"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|