Re: NAT router
- From: "Phillip Windell" <philwindell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:01:56 -0500
"Simon James Owen" <SimonJamesOwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:49A4F749-2357-4010-B96E-228B4B0606F5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the response. I have changed the IP scheme of the internal
interface to subnet 255.255.255.0 and the subnet of the external interface
to
255.255.254.0. I have disabled and reconfigured RAS stating the connection
to
use for the internet.
Those are not subnets,...those are Subnet Masks.
Use 255.255.255.0 on *Everything*
The Subnet is identified by the Net-ID in combination with the mask.
Multiple subnets can (and usually do) have the same Mask. Here is an
example of multiple subnets:
Net-ID=192.168.25.0
Mask = 255.255.255.0
Broadcast = 192.168.25.255
Host Range = 192.168.25.1-192.168.25.254
Net-ID=192.168.26.0
Mask = 255.255.255.0
Host Range = 192.168.26.1-192.168.26.254
Net-ID=192.168.27.0
Mask = 255.255.255.0
Host Range = 192.168.27.1-192.168.27.254
Net-ID=192.168.28.0
Mask = 255.255.255.0
Host Range = 192.168.28.1-192.168.28.254
Avoid the heavily *over-used* lower numbers (like 192.168.1.0).
The External side of the RRAS NAT Box will be a Public IP# (not
192.168.*.*).
The RRAS NAT box will *replace* any other "NAT router" that may be there.
The RRAS box *is* your "router".
If you intend to keep an existing NAT Device then there is no real point in
having the Windows RRAS NAT Box in the first place. It is a waist of time
and is over-complicating the network by introducting a Back-to-back DMZ
where there is no point in one being.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT router
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: NAT router
- References:
- NAT router
- From: Simon James Owen
- Re: NAT router
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: NAT router
- From: Simon James Owen
- NAT router
- Prev by Date: Re: Not browsing
- Next by Date: Re: Run out of IP addresses
- Previous by thread: Re: NAT router
- Next by thread: Re: NAT router
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|