RE: CMAK elevated privs for Vista

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



Thank you for the response. However, the issue I am having is not updating
the routing table, that works fine and the file I added to CMAK was
configured as you suggested. The issue is on Vista when running the client,
there is an error that pops up telling me that the CMROUTE.DLL needs to be
run with elevated privileges. I donot want endusers having to deal with that
and this was not the case on XP. Is there a way to create a package with CMAK
that does not invoke this message? In other words, is it possible to somehow
address this programmatically?

-----------
Anyone who knows everything, leads a pretty boring life


"Miles Li [MSFT]" wrote:

Hello,

Thanks for your post.

The cmroute.dll is used to update the client routing table on the client
computer according to the CMAK package. However, there is a compatibility
issue for implementing CMAK created in previous operation system in the
Windows Vista. From my research, you can modify the routing configuration
files as follows:

Original routing configuration file like:

ADD 192.168.2.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC 1 IF default
ADD 192.168.3.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC 1 IF default
ADD 192.168.4.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC 1 IF default
ADD 10.3.0.0 MASK 255.255.0.0 default METRIC 1 IF default
ADD 10.5.0.0 MASK 255.255.0.0 default METRIC 1 IF default
REMOVE_GATEWAY

Modify the default METRIC from 1 to "default"

ADD 192.168.2.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC default IF default
ADD 192.168.3.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC default IF default
ADD 192.168.4.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC default IF default
ADD 10.3.0.0 MASK 255.255.0.0 default METRIC default IF default
ADD 10.5.0.0 MASK 255.255.0.0 default METRIC default IF default
REMOVE_GATEWAY

Then save and check how it works.

More information about routing table updates you may refer to:

Including routing table updates
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/cc37da78-1138-4186-9a
bb-32b31ca8eac41033.mspx

Hope it helps.



Sincerely,
Miles Li

Microsoft Online Partner Support
Microsoft Global Technical Support Center

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: CMAK elevated privs for Vista
    ... Ok I have installed a Server 2008 system and used the updated CMAK tool, ... is there a way create this package without ... The cmroute.dll is used to update the client routing table on the client ... ADD 192.168.2.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC 1 IF default ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Programming Question: Policy Based Routing
    ... My definition of Policy-Based Routing: ... address, L4 protocol, tos, packet length. ... packet and an AVL tree to store routing information in it. ... first thing is to create a generic route mask. ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: Programming Question: Policy Based Routing
    ... > My definition of Policy-Based Routing: ... > address, L4 protocol, tos, packet length. ... > packet and an AVL tree to store routing information in it. ... > first thing is to create a generic route mask. ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • RE: CMAK elevated privs for Vista
    ... The cmroute.dll is used to update the client routing table on the client ... computer according to the CMAK package. ... ADD 192.168.2.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 default METRIC 1 IF default ... More information about routing table updates you may refer to: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Netmasks for dummies
    ... > Very quick check - I don't see an RFC that says this is a MUST, ... > the concept of the longest mask. ... the routing protocols that were meant to deal with it. ... conscious of the differences between network scope and host scope ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)