Re: File Copying

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



OK, this would make a little more sense, but I don't understand why the
workstation would would copy the files to it's own RAM when the files should
be copied between the servers. This had been the case with Novell and ncopy
had to be used to do a file copy that bypassed the 3rd PC. Do you know if MS
has any documentation supporting your suggestion?

I am running this by using 3rd party automated software via command line.
So, I could try using psexec to run the batch on one of the servers, but
didn't think was required. Having the file copied to local RAM is so old
school!

Thanks Phillip.

"Phillip Windell" wrote:

"SteveW" <SteveW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:31738180-FF18-4691-8CD5-CC3478E07939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sure, I understand the difference between 1gb and 100 mb. If I moved one
of
the servers to 100mb, I can understand the difference. But why would
moving
the workstation that initiates the copy cause the file copy to slow down?
What data is being exchanged between this workstation and the servers
doing
the copy? It shouldn't make this difference, but it appears it does.

It is because the Workstation copies the file into its own RAM and then
copies it from RAM to the target server because it is the Workstation's own
I/O system that is involved. It does not go directly between the two
servers. Thw workstation's perpspective of the copy is that it is copying
from one UNC Location to another UNC Location just like if it was from one
local drive to another local drive. So you effectively copy the file twice
(to the workstation,..from the workstation).

If you want it to go directly between the two servers either:

1. Go to the server itself and do it (doesn't matter which server, just pick
one)

OR

2. Use Remote Desktop from the workstation to connect to one of the servers
(either one) and do the copy from the remote session.

OR

3. Write a batch file that resides on one of the two servers that has the
command to do the copy. Have it execute using the Task Scheduler. (No you
can't execute the batch file from the workstation because it will run in the
workstation's RAM again).

There are probably a few other ways, but those are the three most obvious
ways that I can think of.

--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/ISA2004_AccessRules.html

Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/1/8/918ed2d3-71d0-40ed-8e6d-fd6eeb6cfa07/ts_rules.doc

Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp

Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/edgesecurity/partners/hardwarepartners.mspx
-----------------------------------------------------



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: File Copying
    ... workstation would would copy the files to it's own RAM when the files should be copied between the servers. ... So, I could try using psexec to run the batch on one of the servers, but didn't think was required. ... Having the file copied to local RAM is so old school! ... any copy operation consists of a read operation from disk via a buffer into local RAM and from there, via a buffer onto another disk. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: File Copying
    ... workstation would would copy the files to it's own RAM when the files should ... be copied between the servers. ... So, I could try using psexec to run the batch on one of the servers, but ... Having the file copied to local RAM is so old ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: File Copying
    ... workstation would would copy the files to it's own RAM when the files should be copied between the servers. ... So, I could try using psexec to run the batch on one of the servers, but didn't think was required. ... Having the file copied to local RAM is so old school! ... any copy operation consists of a read operation from disk via a buffer into local RAM and from there, via a buffer onto another disk. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: cant login to exchange
    ... Is your workstation configured to use one of your companys DNS servers? ... see Help and Support Center at ... > message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.general)
  • Re: Event ids 529 and 681
    ... you see a large number of these from the same workstation in a short period ... type of failed audits and the workstation and/or domain names are ... > Servers members of SERVERS domain. ... Not members of SERVERS domain. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)