Re: File Copying
- From: SteveW <SteveW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:29:00 -0800
OK, this would make a little more sense, but I don't understand why the
workstation would would copy the files to it's own RAM when the files should
be copied between the servers. This had been the case with Novell and ncopy
had to be used to do a file copy that bypassed the 3rd PC. Do you know if MS
has any documentation supporting your suggestion?
I am running this by using 3rd party automated software via command line.
So, I could try using psexec to run the batch on one of the servers, but
didn't think was required. Having the file copied to local RAM is so old
school!
Thanks Phillip.
"Phillip Windell" wrote:
"SteveW" <SteveW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message.
news:31738180-FF18-4691-8CD5-CC3478E07939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sure, I understand the difference between 1gb and 100 mb. If I moved one
of
the servers to 100mb, I can understand the difference. But why would
moving
the workstation that initiates the copy cause the file copy to slow down?
What data is being exchanged between this workstation and the servers
doing
the copy? It shouldn't make this difference, but it appears it does.
It is because the Workstation copies the file into its own RAM and then
copies it from RAM to the target server because it is the Workstation's own
I/O system that is involved. It does not go directly between the two
servers. Thw workstation's perpspective of the copy is that it is copying
from one UNC Location to another UNC Location just like if it was from one
local drive to another local drive. So you effectively copy the file twice
(to the workstation,..from the workstation).
If you want it to go directly between the two servers either:
1. Go to the server itself and do it (doesn't matter which server, just pick
one)
OR
2. Use Remote Desktop from the workstation to connect to one of the servers
(either one) and do the copy from the remote session.
OR
3. Write a batch file that resides on one of the two servers that has the
command to do the copy. Have it execute using the Task Scheduler. (No you
can't execute the batch file from the workstation because it will run in the
workstation's RAM again).
There are probably a few other ways, but those are the three most obvious
ways that I can think of.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/ISA2004_AccessRules.html
Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/1/8/918ed2d3-71d0-40ed-8e6d-fd6eeb6cfa07/ts_rules.doc
Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/edgesecurity/partners/hardwarepartners.mspx
-----------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: File Copying
- From: Philip Herlihy
- Re: File Copying
- References:
- Re: File Copying
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: File Copying
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: File Copying
- Prev by Date: Re: File Copying
- Next by Date: Re: File Copying
- Previous by thread: Re: File Copying
- Next by thread: Re: File Copying
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|