Site-to-Site VPN client routing question - clients at branch office not able to access network at HQ
- From: "Hii Sing Chung" <singchung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:53:38 +0800
I have a small network (5 clients) at Shanghai (192.168.1.0/24) and my HQ is
in Singapore (97 clients, 194.1.1.0/24). My task is to connect the 2
networks using Windows RRAS. In HQ I already has a RRAS server (SGRAS01)
that I setup using Windows 2000 server. It has been running well for 5
years, serving VPN clients. SGRAS01 has 2 physical network interfaces, one
connecting to the Internet, one sitting on 194.1.1.0 network. I set up a
Windows 2003 server at Shanghai (SHDC01), it is a domain controller of the
same domain at my HQ (no child domain). SHDC01 has only 1 network card, it
is behind a TP-LINK TL-R402M router. I also configured a persistent demand
dial interface on SHDC01 to connect to SGRAS01, and a corresponding demail
dial interface on SGRAS01 (currently disabled). The Windows Firewall hasn't
been enabled yet on SHDC01. Right now I wish to accomplish the
Shanghai-Singapore 1-way connection first, before going into the 2-way VPN
connection (I am prepared to change the router). I set a fixed IP
(194.1.1.49) on the Dial-in tab of the user account (ddsgusser) used for the
demand dial interface on SHDC01. The clients on the Shanghai networks are
configured (using DHCP) to route packets destined for 194.1.1.0 through
SHDC01. A route print on any clients can verify the routing entry 194.1.1.0
255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2, where 192.168.1.2 is the IP address of SHDC01.
The demand dial connection from SHDC01 to SGRAS01 is successful, and SHDC01
has no problem connecting to any clients on the 194.1.1.0 networks. However,
all the clients on the Shanghai network cannot access any clients on
Singapore network, tracert shows the packets are lost after going through
SHDC01. The clients on the Shanghai network can access Singapore network if
they use direct vpn connection to SGRAS01, which they have been doing all
this while.
You can see the screen captures here: http://singchung.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!CEF9A5068D415432!404.entry
Any help or suggestions is very much appreciated.
Sing Chung
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: prohibit access to server based on ip address
- Next by Date: Re: Site-to-Site VPN client routing question - clients at branch office not able to access network at HQ
- Previous by thread: Re: Roaming profiles don't load on workstations
- Next by thread: Re: Site-to-Site VPN client routing question - clients at branch office not able to access network at HQ
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|