Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75 <markm75c@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:03:08 -0700
On Sep 14, 4:04 pm, "Phillip Windell" <philwind...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"markm75" <markm...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189787349.450280.58110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'll start the description from scratch.. and maybe this will shed
some light:
I have a symantec gateway router.. connected to the internet and my
internal .100 lan (call it the real lan).
Ok. Let's call it the "100-LAN" and the "277-LAN". Numbers are more
specific,.."real" and "virtual" are too fuzzy. It really doesn't matter if
it is virtual or physical, it all works by the same rules.
On this device I setup the static route.. It is set to 192.168.227.0,
255.255.255.0 mask, 192.168.227.6 gateway (the RRAS on the virtual
LAN).
Ok. I belive that is wrong. But I can't tell wht it should be because you
haven't given the real IP#s numbers for the devices. The Symantec Device
eixsts on the 100-LAN,...Gateways must exist on the *same* network as the
device that uses it. Therefore the Gateway has to be a number from the
100-LAN.
I'm a little fuzzy on why this is wrong above.
The symantec gateway router's ip address is 192.168.100.1.
The gateway on the other (virtual) lan is 192.168.227.6 (yeah it
should have been a .1, but i was mirroring other server properties and
that server on the other side is .6).
So you are saying, the reason my 227-lan cant ping the net by ip
address is due to the static route assigned on Symantec .100.1
router?
When I setup a new static route on the router it asks for the
following:
Destination IP: (for this i have 192.168.227.0)
Netmask: the usual
Gateway: 192.168.227.6
Interface: I chose internal lan, but there is also wan1, wan2
available (internet side i guess)
Metric: 0
So this setting isnt correct?
Without this setting, i couldn't ping each network from the other via
IP address... when i put in this static route.. pinging worked out
fine, so I assumed at least internally, lan wise, it was correct.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: markm75
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- From: Phillip Windell
- Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- Prev by Date: chaining hubs and switches
- Next by Date: Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- Previous by thread: Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- Next by thread: Re: How to enable communication between Two different lans (subnets)/ domains 2003 server based? Assistance?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading