Re: Client configuration for multiple DHCP scope



"Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eNqdnQaMeMBU9HXbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Phillip Windell" <philwindell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uwrln1U9HHA.5164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In all the years I have been doing these group (around 6 or 7 years) I
have seen hundreds of people saying they were using a Superscope,...out
of those hundreds only one that I can [barely] remember was legitamently
using it for the correct reason in the correct topology design.

Legitimate use for supserscope would be two overlapping subnets on the
same physical ethernet?

Yes.

It still requires a Router to route between the logical segments and both
interfaces of the router would also be on the same "wire".

The Hosts would be "subnet agnostic" meaning the Hosts would not care what
subnet they randomly "landed on" after getting their config from the DHCP
Superscope.

If the Admin "cares" what subnet they land on, then he needs to stop using a
Multi-Net and Superscopes.

Since VLANs have been invented the reason for a Multi-Net to exist has
become almost non-existant. VLANs also [potentially] run over the same
physical wire but the VLAN technology separates the physical "wire" into
different "logical wires" so that the LAN behaves like a normal multiple
subnet LAN and uses normal DHCP without Superscopes. A LAN Router is still
required with VLANs but each interface is on a different "logical wire".

VLANs, for the most part, are the replacement for the old Multi-Net
technology and the Superscope feature of DHCP could potentially be dropped
as a feature in newer versions of DHCP and "life would go on".

--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DHCP relay, superscope and laptops
    ... each of which has it's own subnet. ... The Switch then acts as a DHCP relay, ... relaying DHCP requests to a central DHCP server, ... What we did as a workaround, was that we created one superscope for each ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Different terms for the same or more secure?
    ... Can anyone give me an example of say a company with two branches in different locations with each branch have its own sales and accounts department. ... The departments of each office would have IP's from their respective subnet. ... so, in the example above although I might have 2 physical LANs I could also have 2 VLANS, one for sales and one for accounts? ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: dhcp only offers IP for one subnet
    ... Use a separate scope for each subnet and set the router that is ... > between the subnets to forward DHCP request to the proper DHCP Server and ... Scopes removed from superscope, ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: Cant ping by name outside of subnet
    ... It really doesn't matter whether this is a Switch with separate ... VLANs or Routerwith separate physically subnet (except ... If both/ALL DNS servers work with NSLookup, ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
  • Re: Adding a second domain.
    ... You'll need a router to pass traffic between the VLANs if your ... server and a DC on each VLAN (and yes, they'll have to be different subnets ... If the Internet router is in the subnet for domain 1, ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)