Re: DHCP & NAP
- From: "James McIllece [MS]" <jamesmci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:55:42 -0700
"Sam" <smd6169@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:e2P0cf7zHHA.1100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Not sure if this is the right group for this so if not, can someone
point me to the right one...
In a test lab I deployed a Domain with an NPS server (DHCP NAP
Enforcement), a DHCP server with the followiing Scope (192.168.0.10 -
.20\24) with NAP enabled on the scope, a VISTA client and an XP
client. I enabled the NAP client on VISTA client, XP has no client.
My VISTA client recieves a dynamic IP as it's supposed to but my XP
client will not. Once I disable NAP for the scope, XP is able to get
an IP. Enable NAP again, no IP for XP.
That said, when I try to add a 2nd scope in hopes of servicing
machines in the lab with out the NAP client (SCOPE IP - 192.168.0.30 -
50\24) I recieve a conflict error with the first scope. Do I need to
set up a 2nd DHCP server and enable the 2nd scope there? Is there a
way to make this one DHCP server service all machines with an IP,
regardless of NAP client and while maintaining NAP enabled on my first
scope? Is this something to configure with DHCP or with in NAP?
Thank you - SD
For the first issue, XP doesn't support NAP, only Vista does.
For the second issue, it sounds like you have enabled NAP for all scopes.
Disable NAP for all scopes, then for individual scopes that you want to use
to enforce NAP, enable NAP enforcement on a scope by scope basis.
--
James McIllece, Microsoft
Please do not send email directly to this alias. This is my online account
name for newsgroup participation only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DHCP & NAP
- From: Sam
- Re: DHCP & NAP
- References:
- DHCP & NAP
- From: Sam
- DHCP & NAP
- Prev by Date: Re: Trouble adding pc to domain
- Next by Date: Re: Trouble adding pc to domain
- Previous by thread: DHCP & NAP
- Next by thread: Re: DHCP & NAP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|