Re: Subnet recommendations for a multi-site network
- From: "Bill Grant" <not.available@online>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 14:55:09 +1000
"Dave Fitton" <DaveFitton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EA741960-69A5-41BD-8AEA-066E02165CC4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Our college is shortly to be merged with an other college and the 2 IT
teams
are working on a IP addressing scheme that will best fit for a merged
network
Current setup is:
College A - uses a single 10.1.0.0 /255.255.0.0 class B type subnet on a
single site - around 900 client PCs - both admin and student PC on same
subnet
College B - uses a 10.0.0.0/255.248.0.0 for the student network and
172.16.0.0/255.255.0.0 for the admin network. Both these subnets span a
100MB
link between 2 sites - both with around 450 PCs each
We need a scheme that will work for the merged college across 3 sites in
total
My solution for the merged 3-site college would be to use
1. Single subnets for each site - eg
10.1.0.0 /255.255.0.0 for site 1,
10.2.0.0 /255.255.0.0 for site 2,
10.3.0.0 /255.255.0.0 for site 3
2. 100mb links between the sites
My questions are:
a) Does this look a feasible solution
b) Is subnetting a Class A network into Class B type subnets the
recommended/easiest way to subnet a Class A - a subnet mask of 255.252.0.0
has been suggested
c) Should all internal clients use the same Network address - in has been
suggested that 10 range and 172 range be kept
Any suggestions welcomed
Thanks
Dave F
That sounds sensible to me. I can't see any reason to use a subnet mask
shorter than 16 bits. I can't imagine a site outgrowing the capacity of a
10.x.0.0/16 subnet .
I can't see any reason to stay with the 172.16 . On the other hand
there is no real reason to change it if it means a lot of work, but it
would look tidier if they were all 10.x.0.0/16 as you suggest.
How are the machines split up within sites? Surely the 900 odd machines
are not all in the same broadcast domain?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: VPN Gateway
- Next by Date: Re: Clients mappings to servers are failing.
- Previous by thread: Re: Clients mappings to servers are failing.
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding the impact of a DHCP server outage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|