Re: Server 2003 and UNC paths
- From: Jeffrey Randow <jeffreycentex@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:36:36 -0500
It's treated the same way. It per connection from computer to
computer. That is why you can't map to two different shares on the
same user with two different sets of credentials.
--
Jeffrey Randow
jeffreycentex@xxxxxxxxx
Windows Networking MVP 2001-2006
http://www.networkblog.net
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:23:10 -0400, Rick Charnes
<rickxyz--nospam.zyxcharnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Running Windows Server 2003, we have a batch file executed by a user.
other than the server user account. I understand from Microsoft that
"redirected drives cannot be shared between processes that are runing
under different user accounts". It seems though that a batch file
should be able to go to a different server using a UNC path rather than
a hard-coded drive letter:
PUSHD \\newservername\dirname\subdirname\
Is there a reason why that shouldn't work? General network resources
like a UNC path aren't "redirected drives", are they?
- References:
- Server 2003 and UNC paths
- From: Rick Charnes
- Server 2003 and UNC paths
- Prev by Date: Re: ISA Installation and more!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Traffic block by server
- Previous by thread: Server 2003 and UNC paths
- Next by thread: Windows networking issue
- Index(es):