Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- From: "Neteng" <neteng.ccie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:04:15 -0500
As Phillip mentioned, a router.
"RickyVene" <RickyVene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8FDAC361-3975-436A-9BC3-0986845D1D22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are you saying that 16 bit segments can communicate with 24 bits? By whatSegmenting
devices I need to use?
Please advise more.
Thanks,
Ricky
"Phillip Windell" wrote:
"RickyVene" <RickyVene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:07E26D90-19FA-4317-B453-8BD412AD1817@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'll try that segmentation, but what is the best way to do that? By
bridges
or by router segmentation.
Bridges are just another name for Switches. Switches are Layer2.
ais Layer3, Routers are Layer3,...so you have to use a Router. There are
option,lot of devices being sold now that are both a Router and a Switch in the
same box,...they are called Layer3 Switches. These are a very good
fromjust be sure to keep separated in your mind the router functionality
usingthe switch functionality even though it is happeing in the same box.
How about the L2TP/IPSEC for VPN on ISA 2004? Right now, I'm only
Ithe
PPTP protocol. Is it advisable to go to ipsec?
VPN is already encapsulated with just using PPTP,...that's what PPTP is.
madehave never messed with L2TP/IPSec,...it has never even interested me or
theme curious enough to try. Some people love it,...I couldn't care less
about it. Your choice. I have also never wanted to spend the $$ to buy
messCerts to do it and the MS Cert Services is just too big of a hassel to
migratewith for me.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
Thanks,
Ricky
"Phillip Windell" wrote:
You can add two 24bit segments alongside of the existing ones and
16bitto
the new segments over a period of time. If you can wittle down the
fallsegment to less than 254 Hosts and have them grouped into IP#s that
thatinto a 24bit range,...then all you have to do is change the mask. At
bitpoint even the mask can be changed over time because both a 16 and 24
evenmask would work for those simultanously.
Once the original 16 segment is split into 24bit segments you could
toget
rid of the new ones you created that aren't needed anymore. It is up
segmentyou
how to deal with that.
Once you are out of the woods with all this,...always keep your
aboutat
254 hosts or less (24bit mask). Ethernet looses effieciency after
as300
hosts per segment. It is even true with gigbit however it just isn't
thatnoticable to "humans".
IPSec is not meant for running between every Host on a LAN. That is
horrible. IPSec has a high overhead. It was intended to be used in a
"point-to-point" situation like maybe a WAN link between two sites.
IPSec's primary purpose is to prevent "eavesdropping" by Sniffers by
encrypting the packets. On the Local LAN your Switches already do
Monitoringby
isolating the session between a pair of "talking" hosts to its own
"virtual
circuit". You have to specifically configure the Switch with a
thatPort to use a Sniffer. So you don't need IPSec for that.
You can do "firewall-like" filtering with IPSec too, but you can do
almostwithout IPSec anyway, so what's the point? Plus the LAN has to be
filtering"wide open" just to function normally, so there isn't a lot of
oneven possible there.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"RickyVene" <RickyVene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9596A79B-CDFF-4E5A-A9D1-B269091F5224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have a 16 bit subnet which is hard to administer especially with
Network
speed.
I disable my ghost because it's a network killer.
Can I do segmentation with 16 bit subnet with another router?
I need also to implement IPSEC. Does this going to be a big impact
ourit?
Can't change my subnet, it's a big task and additional fees because
integrated VOIP, UNIX and others are already in-placed.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Ricky
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- From: RickyVene
- Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- References:
- Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- From: RickyVene
- Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- From: RickyVene
- Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- Prev by Date: Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- Next by Date: Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- Previous by thread: Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- Next by thread: Re: 16 bit subnet segmentation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|