Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- From: "Bill Grant" <not.available@online>
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:58:55 +1000
The dhcp-style allocator in NAT is not configured automatically. If you
want to use it, you configure a pool of IP addresses for NAT to allocate to
the client machines. (You do this from the NAT Properties ***). If you do
not configure any addresses, you need to set up a DHCP server on the LAN or
use static config for the hosts. Either setup should work.
NAT is a fairly simple setup. There are really only a few things that
must be set for it to work.
1. The public interface must have a default route out to the Interent.
2. The public and private interfaces to be used must be assigned in NAT.
3. The client machines must use the NAT router's private interface as their
default gateway.
What are you doing about DNS? If the client uses the server's private
NIC IP address for DNS, NAT will act as a DNS relay and forward the DNS
requests to your ISP (or whatever the server's public NIC uses).
Alex Smirnoff wrote:
When you say "But you do have to configure NAT on the RRAS server,
just leave the area for IP addresses blank", what do you mean? NAT is
enabled on the public interface of the RRAS server already. What is
this "area for IP addresses" - I just dont see it.
"Bill Grant" wrote:
You do not have to use the DHCP-style allocator in NAT. You can
use static IPs or you can run DHCP on one of your servers. But you
do have to configure NAT on the RRAS server. Just leave the area for
IP addresses blank. As long as you set the RRAS server's private IP
as the default gateway on the second machine (which you have done)
it should work for any
10.x.x.x address.
Alex Smirnoff wrote:
Setup scenario: Windows Server 2003 R2 x64, two network cards - one
public and one private. I followed all instructions and installed
routing and remote access services, configured one network interface
as public and another as private (with IP 10.0.0.16). Everything
works fine and server can access internet.
Then I started configuring another machine on the internal network
to use first machine as router and got stuck. I dont want to use
DHCP allocator and want to assign internall addresses manually. So I
configured second machine as such (it is another W2K3 R2 x64, if it
matters):
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.10
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.0.0.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.16
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.16
Again, everything works and I can ping one machine from another.
But I cannot access outside world from the second machine. I
realized that first server will not do NAT because it doesnt know
that it should do it for particular internal IP.
So how I can the main server to do NAT for all internal network
without using DCHP?
I would really appreciate any help/advice.
Alex
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- From: Alex Smirnoff
- Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- References:
- Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- Prev by Date: Remote Desktop 5.2 Client
- Next by Date: Re: Remote Desktop 5.2 Client
- Previous by thread: Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- Next by thread: Re: NAT without DHCP? (w2k3)
- Index(es):
Loading