Re: Access local shares when DC is down
- From: "Louis Vitiello Jr." <louv-mcse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:14:00 -0400
Sorry for my delay. Create a regular account you would make on a domain. My
methodology will eliminate having to make a local profile for everyone.
Hope this helps,
--
Louis Vitiello Jr.
------------------------------
MCSE, MCSA, MCP, A+/N+
ERCP XP Pro / Net Concepts
<ACutsumbis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150232308.415566.238810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The site is small, and i don't mind having to recreate users accounts
locally. The guest account just can NOT be enable, reguardless of how
much extra work it may require.
I understand that in a p2p network, there would be no gobal accounts,
but, the previous suggestion, was talking about creating one on the DC.
Thanks
Joshua Bolton wrote:
Of course enabling the guest account is a less than secure option. But
consider the request of "on the fly" changing from client/server to peer
to
peer networking. If you don't want to enable the guest account your only
option is to create a local account for EVERY person you want accessing
the
share when the server is down. This means x amount of wksts times x
amount
of users that you will have to sync their local account/password with the
pc
with the shares [along with their AD accouont passwds]. Then you have to
assign those users to those shares. Whew I get tired just thinking about
it.
Makes enabling the guest account look pretty easy doesn't it?
There are no "global" accounts in a peer to peer network!!! There is no
server/AD authenication if the DC is down.
*********************************************************
"So let's say we create a user called Share with a password of 123456 on
the
server. You would also create a local account on the workstation you wish
to
share from as Share \ 123456. Then for the logon script,
net use S: \\workstation\share 123456 /user:DOMAIN\Share /savecred "
Are you suggesting creating a user account on the server and all pcs
called
"share"? Looks to be just another name for "guest". AND you would put
the
local password in the script??? I would consider that far more insecure
than
enabling guest
.
- References:
- Access local shares when DC is down
- From: ACutsumbis
- Re: Access local shares when DC is down
- From: Louis Vitiello Jr.
- Re: Access local shares when DC is down
- From: ACutsumbis
- Re: Access local shares when DC is down
- From: ACutsumbis
- Re: Access local shares when DC is down
- From: ACutsumbis
- Access local shares when DC is down
- Prev by Date: Re: VPN client disconnect - Eventid 20194
- Next by Date: Re: Aggregating NICs
- Previous by thread: Re: Access local shares when DC is down
- Next by thread: DHCP Clients Acquiring WRONG Options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|