Re: Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- From: "Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:54:44 -0700
I did not say firewalls stop viruses. I said a firewall *limits the scope
of things a virus can attack*. All the firewall does is narrow an attack
profile.
--
Will
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:#NnAe0OeGHA.1264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagethe
news:PJGdna_drMJLpPTZnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For this particular network, both the clients and the domain controllerare
protected internal networks behind a firewall. Neither is exposed to
outside. We generally put a firewall between our internal clients andthe
domain controller just to limit the scope of things that a virus canattack
directly on the domain controller.
Firewalls don't stop viruses.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
.
- References:
- Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- From: Will
- Re: Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- From: Robert Moir
- Re: Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- From: Will
- Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- Prev by Date: Re: Static routes needed to LAN routing aspect of RRAS?
- Next by Date: RE: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND - slow network
- Previous by thread: Re: Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- Next by thread: Re: Stand Alone DHCP Servers and Windows 2000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|