Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: "Jack H" <strangerx@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:16:19 -0500
I think so.
I only have one subnet. All the rest are different IP ranges depending on
the location.
I will make something like you are talking about.
As far as the router, there is an eithernet port with the IP of 172.20.4.1.
The serial port is 172.20.6.1 and that interfaces to the router on the .5.x
at the other building.
the firewall is a Fortigate 100.
"Ace Fekay [MVP]"
<PleaseSubstituteMyActualFirstName&LastNameHere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:%23piO%23w0CGHA.516@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In news:eKe$0AwCGHA.1088@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Stranger <strangerx@xxxxxxxx> stated, which I commented on below:
>> I know when I go into the configuration of the firewall, there is a
>> tab called router. There is a static route in there for the
>> 172.20.5.x network.
>> For the other networks 172.20.8.x, .7.x, .4.x, there are policies
>> under the firewall tab. Of course the 7 and 8 network are connected
>> via the IPSEC tunel.
>>
>> Since I'm adding the 9.x network "on top" of the .4.x network and the
>> firewall only has an ip on the lan side for the 4.x network, I wonder
>> if I need to add another ip for the 9.x network. I know that the
>> firewall can also act as a layer 3 router if adding virutal lans to
>> it. I do have a call into the manufacturer to see what they say.
>>
>> I would think that adding an ip range would not be this difficult. It is
>> the first time I'm trying it. :)
>
> I still think it's a route design issue and not necessarily a
> manufacturer's issue. If the router has multiple NICs, what is the default
> gateway of that router? Whatever router that is, should have a static
> route to the other internal NICs if they are upstream. What type if
> firewall is it?
>
> Can you re-do your drawing for a more quasi-logical (and I hate to use the
> term 'logical' when talking about subnets) and their actual Ip addresses
> similar to my drawing to get a clearer picture? Maybe that will help to
> understand what direction and what Ips are where in relation to what
> device. When depicting the VLANs on your switches, show them as networks
> (subnets) as the "bar" shows a subnet in my drawing. Does that make sense?
>
> Ace
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- References:
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Prev by Date: Re: nslookup
- Next by Date: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading