Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: "Ace Fekay [MVP]" <PleaseSubstituteMyActualFirstName&LastNameHere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:08:23 -0500
In news:%23MHDCuqCGHA.412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Stranger <strangerx@xxxxxxxx> stated, which I commented on below:
> I see what you are saying. I removed the static route in the
> firewall and then tried the tracert. It goes to the router
> (172.20.4.1) then to the firewall (172.20.4.2) this part looks ok,
> then it goes out to the internet. So, I think I need to somehow tell
> the firewall that the 172.20.9.x is an internal range. Not sure how
> to do that one if that is what it is. It was easy to do this with
> the other IP ranges since they were coming from other buildings.
The firewall appears to be a bridge, and not a router in your scenario
beacuse it has a 4 interface as well as the "gateway". Is that intentional??
I'm totally confused. Your drawing is confusing.
If the firewall is just bridged, then nothing needs to be done, however, if
it were not bridged, and it has a different IP, then the static rules apply
to it just as if it were a regular old non-firewall router. Follow my
example, in this case the firewall would be like Router A, where as the
"router" is Router B.
Internal net --- Router --- Firewall -- Internet
Internal net is 172.20.9.0, where these machines are sitting on 172.20.4.0.
"Router" above would need nothing sine I am assuming the one of it's
interfaces is on the 172.20.9.0 side, and the other interface would be on
the 172.20.4.0 side, but the firewall is.
Ace
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- References:
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Prev by Date: Re: Introducing XP Prof. in Windows 2000 domain with currently NT clients only
- Next by Date: XP Workstations & VLANs
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading