Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: "Oliver O'Boyle" <ooboyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:10:12 -0500
> Switches are chained (switch 2 plugs into switch 1, which plugs into the
> router.
I'm assuming these are layer 2 switches. please tell me if I'm wrong.
>
> What I find now is when I try to ping an IP on the new range, I get a
> reply from the firewall but TTL is expired in transit. I beleive I need
> to add an entry to the firewall but not sure what to put in it.
>
what vlan nunber are you using, and on which switch? if you want both
subnets to go through both switches, each switch need to be on the same
vlan, or you need to configure the uplink ports as vlan trunks (they will
pass traffic on both vlans).
Oliver
>
> "Oliver O'Boyle" <ooboyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ejQVMdmBGHA.3064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> The router is the current gateway. It also connects the 3rd location
>>> with a T1.
>>
>> ok. So yes, you will a static route pointing to the third location, as
>> you have done.
>>
>>> Added the static route in the router/gateway.
>>
>>> Added VLAN to the switch and assigned it an IP from the new range.
>>> Created the second scope on the windows 2000 server and activated it.
>>
>> are your switches chained (switch 2 plugs into switch 1, which plugs into
>> the router)? Or are they each directly connected into the router?
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I can't reach the switch that is plugged into the one above that I added
>>> the VLAN to.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> "Oliver O'Boyle" <ooboyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:OZY9bskBGHA.4076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I added an IP of the new range to the server and if I connect from the
>>>>> switch at the end with the new IP and perform a ipconfig renew, I
>>>>> receive an IP from the original IP range. If I assign an IP from the
>>>>> new range, I can reach the server and ping the switch, however I can
>>>>> not get to anything on the .4.x network.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this make since?
>>>>
>>>> sort of... it's a bit confusing. However, if your 2811 is multihomed
>>>> (or has two interfaces, each connected to a separate switch), then it
>>>> needs to do the routing for you, unless you also put the server on the
>>>> second range (might be easier, depending on your particular needs).
>>>>
>>>> If you don't put the server on the second range, then each subnet needs
>>>> to point to the router as the default gw. The router will have a route
>>>> to each range by default, because they are both connected to it.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what else you are using the router for, but it might just
>>>> be simpler to multihome your server. You could put two NICs in it, and
>>>> have it communicate directly on each subnet.
>>>>
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!!!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- References:
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Next by Date: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading