Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: "Oliver O'Boyle" <ooboyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:46:53 -0500
> The router is the current gateway. It also connects the 3rd location with
> a T1.
ok. So yes, you will a static route pointing to the third location, as you
have done.
> Added the static route in the router/gateway.
> Added VLAN to the switch and assigned it an IP from the new range.
> Created the second scope on the windows 2000 server and activated it.
are your switches chained (switch 2 plugs into switch 1, which plugs into
the router)? Or are they each directly connected into the router?
Oliver
>
> I can't reach the switch that is plugged into the one above that I added
> the VLAN to.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> "Oliver O'Boyle" <ooboyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OZY9bskBGHA.4076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>> I added an IP of the new range to the server and if I connect from the
>>> switch at the end with the new IP and perform a ipconfig renew, I
>>> receive an IP from the original IP range. If I assign an IP from the
>>> new range, I can reach the server and ping the switch, however I can not
>>> get to anything on the .4.x network.
>>>
>>> Does this make since?
>>
>> sort of... it's a bit confusing. However, if your 2811 is multihomed (or
>> has two interfaces, each connected to a separate switch), then it needs
>> to do the routing for you, unless you also put the server on the second
>> range (might be easier, depending on your particular needs).
>>
>> If you don't put the server on the second range, then each subnet needs
>> to point to the router as the default gw. The router will have a route to
>> each range by default, because they are both connected to it.
>>
>> I'm not sure what else you are using the router for, but it might just be
>> simpler to multihome your server. You could put two NICs in it, and have
>> it communicate directly on each subnet.
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!!!
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- References:
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Stranger
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Oliver O'Boyle
- Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- From: Jack H
- 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Prev by Date: Re: SMB problems.
- Next by Date: Re: FQDN and Netbios question
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd DHCP Scope?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading