Re: VPN IP address issue
- From: "Chris Priede" <priede@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:54:09 -0500
Hi,
moncho wrote:
> I am just wondering why two nic's would not work?
The approach you suggest may be feasible if you only need the VPN tunnel for
exclusive communication between two servers. In that case, you probably
don't even need a second physical NIC -- you only need two addresses from a
different block, for the two tunnel endpoints. Each side can address the
other using opposite tunnel endpoint.
However, if you want to fully connect the two networks, where any machine on
either network could potentially talk to any machine on its local or remote
networks, you will have a routing problem. What you would normally do is
create a routing table entry designating the remote tunnel endpoint as the
gateway for packets destined to the remote network. Unfortunately, if the
remote network is the same as the local network, this is obviously not going
to work.
Certain esoteric designs, like many-to-many NAT on both ends of the tunnel,
theorethically could help, but that would be a lot more complicated than
renumbering and may not be possible on what you have available to work with.
--
Chris Priede
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VPN IP address issue
- From: moncho
- Re: VPN IP address issue
- References:
- VPN IP address issue
- From: moncho
- Re: VPN IP address issue
- From: moncho
- VPN IP address issue
- Prev by Date: Re: Odd SBS 2003 networking problem
- Next by Date: Re: SMB problems.
- Previous by thread: Re: VPN IP address issue
- Next by thread: Re: VPN IP address issue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|