Re: subnetting confusion
- From: "J.Couch via WinServerKB.com" <u14461@uwe>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:04:49 GMT
Very well put Frank... I think I need a little practice giving written advice.
... but I like what you put down here and hope that there is some stuff here
that helps Aaron...
Frankster wrote:
>> What I want to do is get a better understanding of when and why changing a
>> subnet mask is or is not necessary.
>
>You are correct in your assumption that you can carve out a subnet from you
>existing network (alienate) by simply changing the mask. You can also do it
>by changing the IP to be outside of the same mask. But, you do have to
>understand how this works.
>
>A mask of 255.255.255.0 means that to be on the same network (subnet), the
>first three octets have to be the same. The fourth octet can be anything, up
>to 254. If you change a machine's address to be
>same.same.different.different, he will be off your network (on it's own
>subnet). It will not be able to communicate with the original network unless
>you place a router between them and manually forward the networks back and
>forth.
>
>You could also change the mask. For this, I need an IP calculator (crutch)
>because I am not that good at it. However, I will use my own scenario as an
>example because know it is right.
>
>I have purchased a set of 8 static IPs. My ISP gave me the IPs, told me
>which one to assign to my router, which one was used to define the network,
>which one to assign to my firewall (using 3 total at this point). That
>leaves me 5 I can use internally for the machines where I want to have
>public IPs (not often, but it happens). So... Here is what I use:
>IPs 61.50.80.45 to 61.50.80.52. You'll notice that is 8 total IPs (I made
>them up for this post...hehe...). Anyway, my mask is 255.255.255.248
>(really mine). The ending 248 limits my (sub)network to only those 8
>addresses. If I configured an address out of that range he would be off the
>original network. In this case, you are subneting using a mask.
>
>The actual IP and the mask have both got to be taken into consideration to
>determine if you are on the same subnet or not. You can't tell with just
>one.
>
>> I am looking possibly at a better way to organize my network
>
>Use AD and OUs in Windows. Don't bother with subnets unless you can absorb
>the costs of a router between each subnet.
>
>> Maybe my confusion lays in the fact that there are always several ways to
>> accomplish the same thing.
>
>Yes, probably.
>
>> just trying to get a grasp on the big picture really.
>
>Suggest a good read from the bookstore or online about TCP/IP. It's all
>based on binary math. Kinda tedious but helps in the long run.
>
>-Frank
--
Message posted via WinServerKB.com
http://www.winserverkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/windows-server-networking/200512/1
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: subnetting confusion
- From: Frankster
- Re: subnetting confusion
- References:
- subnetting confusion
- From: Aaron Neunz
- Re: subnetting confusion
- From: Frankster
- Re: subnetting confusion
- From: Aaron Neunz
- Re: subnetting confusion
- From: Frankster
- subnetting confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Subnet & VLAN question
- Next by Date: Re: duplicate name - with a CNAME
- Previous by thread: Re: subnetting confusion
- Next by thread: Re: subnetting confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|