Re: LAN routing
- From: exchangerookie1994 <exchangerookie1994@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:12:02 -0700
I would not mind at all to put a couple of routes in on each of the subnet
routers.
I would like for every host in main Lan to be able to talk to every host on
remote Lan.
What I have done so far-
Main lan = 192.168.100.0/24
Gateway (PIX 506) = 192.168.100.1
All clients on this LAN have DG of 192.168.100.1
Remote Lan = 192.168.101.0/24
Gateway WIn2k3 Server = 192.168.101.1
All clients have 192.168.101.1 AS DG
I have added static routes to both default gateways
Main site - route add 192.168.101.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.241
METRIC 1
Remote Site - route add 192.168.100.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.1
METRIC 1
enabled IP routing in registry
I can ping 192.168.100.1 at main site from client at remote site, but cannot
ping any other hosts on main site
I can ping 192.168.101.5 (host pc at remote site) from 192.168.100.1 at main
site
Ideally I would like every host at main site to ping every host on remote
site seemlessly.
Do I have to add static routes to every host on both networks to be able to
do this?
Thanks
"Jason Gurtz" wrote:
> [only need to post once please]
>
> On 8/18/2005 07:21, exchangerookie1994 wrote:
> > We have a remote office currently connected by 2 mb long haul Dsl connection
> > to inside of our main lan. We are interested in configuring a 2003 server as
> > a router at the remote location and setting them on a new IP scheme/ subnet.
>
> you should just use a hardware router IMO. Check out the Cisco 831, it's
> not too expensive (few hundred) and will be much more reliable. RIP
> protocol should be able to handle dynamic adding of routes in a small WAN
> network but honestly, is it that bad to put a couple static routes in, one
> time, when you set it up? Clients can have their gateway changed via DHCP.
>
> You could try a cheapo SOHO router but they tend to be not to feature
> complete for a corp WAN since they are designed for mostly DSL/Cable
> gateway applications. They also tend to crash under load.
>
> ~Jason
>
> --
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LAN routing
- From: Jason Gurtz
- Re: LAN routing
- References:
- LAN routing
- From: exchangerookie1994
- Re: LAN routing
- From: Jason Gurtz
- LAN routing
- Prev by Date: Re: Lost netowrk connections!
- Next by Date: Re: LAN routing
- Previous by thread: Re: LAN routing
- Next by thread: Re: LAN routing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|