Re: New to RRAS for Routing
- From: "Stephen S" <anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:23:01 +1000
Dear Phillip and Bill,
Many thanks for your explanation and advice.
However, I don't understand your saying that "Don't forget to add the other
subnet to the LAT on the Proxy, as Bill also
reminded you too". I have added the new subnet to the LAT on the Proxy
(Just amend you statement). But what is the other subnet ?
Thanks
Stephen
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:%23oys1mCnFHA.4028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bill's got you covered. I'll just toss in a few comments on your points
> below.
>
> "Stephen S" <anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:eo2yFiimFHA.1968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 1) In your point 1, all hosts on the LAN = Testing LAN ?
>
> LAN means the whole thing,...all subnets together. A subnet is effectively
> a
> network, the LAN is the whole collection of local Networks.
>
>> 2) In your point 2, the RRAS Router already connected to different LAN
>> segments. Does it mean that it is because I have enable "LAN Routing" in
>> Configure, Custom configuration; check the box for LAN routing ?
>
> It means the RRAS router is directly (physically) connected to each
> segment
> (it sits between them). Therefore they are already in its routing
> table,..therfore it already knows about them,..therefore there are no
> static
> routes to create.
>
>> 3) In your point 3, do you mean the Internet Sharing Device = Proxy
>> Server
>> in my office ?
>
> Yes, a Proxy, or a Hardware Firewall, or a NAT Server are all consider
> "Internet Sharing Devices". I use that generic form of the term when I do
> not know (or forget) exactly what king of device you are using.
>
>> 4) In your next mail, you mention there are entries have to be added to
> the
>> Local Address Table, how many entires have to be added there ?
>
> Just one. It goes on the Proxy itself. The proxy does not know about the
> Segment on the opposite side of the LAN Router because it is obviously not
> directly connected to it. Therefore it needs a Static route to cover
> that.
> If the "test Lan" is 192.18.17.x and the RRAS Router is 192.168.18.10 then
> the router would be dones as:
> "route add -p 192.168.17.0 mask255.255.255.0 192.168.18.10"
>
> *Don't* use those exact addresses if they are not correct. I was only
> guessing at what they would be from looking at your other post.
>
> Don't forget to add the other subnet to the LAT on the Proxy, as Bill also
> reminded you too.
>
> --
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
> http://www.isaserver.org/articles/ISA2004_AccessRules.html
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Guidance
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/techinfo/Guidance/2004.asp
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/techinfo/Guidance/2000.asp
>
> Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
> http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
.
- References:
- New to RASS for Routing
- From: Stephen S
- Re: New to RASS for Routing
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: New to RRAS for Routing
- From: Stephen S
- Re: New to RRAS for Routing
- From: Stephen S
- Re: New to RRAS for Routing
- From: Stephen S
- Re: New to RRAS for Routing
- From: Stephen S
- New to RASS for Routing
- Prev by Date: Re: Printing to two different printers at once
- Next by Date: Re: Windows 2003 server DNS problems
- Previous by thread: Re: New to RRAS for Routing
- Next by thread: Win 2003 Sevrer netlogon problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|