Re: Network Design
- From: "Andy" <andy@not>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:55:40 +0100
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:%23QKw1sFaFHA.3784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "seth" <seth@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OokaifFaFHA.3840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> no need for separate domains
>> one domain, web/mail server will be dc
>
> DCs should be dedicated to doing only that, with possibly DHCP and WINS
> included. They should not be used for other services. SBS is the one
> exception and was specially designed to run everything on one box.
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
>
Phillip,
What's the truth here? I have attended a Microsoft technical roadshow
recently where the presenter in two of the sessions recommended putting file
and print services on a DC. I have also had a MS PSS rep advise exactly the
opposite. Same with whether Exchange should be hosted on a DC, MS initially
said NO but again last week a MS Exchange Evangalist said it was OK to run
Exchange on a DC.
Also, on a MOC course we were told always specify two DC's for each domain,
folks here have specified just the one. It's enough to send some mad.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Network Design
- From: Jeff Cochran
- Re: Network Design
- From: Massimiliano Luciani [MVP]
- Re: Network Design
- From: Frankster
- Re: Network Design
- References:
- Network Design
- From: Darrell Martin
- Re: Network Design
- From: seth
- Network Design
- Prev by Date: Netdiag redir failure on Win2K3
- Next by Date: Re: Intruders....?
- Previous by thread: Re: Network Design
- Next by thread: Re: Network Design
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
