Re: Proper way to do shares



Hi Lanwench, why do you recommend a hidden share for the home folder and not
each individual user folder? Why make the home folder a hidden share at all?
Thanks in advance for your reply.

"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:

> Bill Bradley wrote:
> > I'm using a two-node Win2K3 cluster in active/active mode to provide
> > two virtual servers that give access to shared folders (home
> > directories and other shares). The shares are on drives created on a
> > SAN.
> >
> > We have about 1500 users, so I have that many home directories, and
> > each section has a "common" shared folder, and certain groups would
> > have shared folders, so we have about 500 of those.
> >
> > I assume I just share these 2000 folders individually, using user or
> > group rights to provide type of access?
>
> You don't need to share the home directories individually unless you have
> NT/Win9x clients (and not necessarily even then, if you use SUBST in your
> login script). Set up a parent home dir folder and grant administrators,
> system, users, full control. Share the parent home directory folder as home$
> so it's hidden, adjust the share permissions so everyone=full control, and
> then in each users ADUC properties, you can specify
> \\server\home$\%username% - the folder should be automatically created if
> it's set up right, and the permissions should be adjusted appropriately. I'm
> writing this from memory & don't have anything to test with right now, so
> corrections are welcome (esp. as concerns automatic adjustment of
> permissions)...
>
> You may want to set up the 'group' or shared folders as individual shares,
> but you don't have to. Depends on what you want users to see. With Windows,
> folders won't be hidden from view just because users don't have access to
> them - unlike in Netware.
> >
> > With Novell, we had our user and common shared folders within section
> > folders (made it easier to do changes to an entire section), so, if I
> > want to do something similar in Windows, would I create a share for
> > each section only, then use NTFS rights to allow access to folders
> > within the section folder, or share both section folder and
> > individual folders, or what?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "section". I haven't used Netware since 4x...
> or do you mean "department" or "group" ?
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP Pro Sharing problem
    ... Each of the shared folders is set up exactly the same ... Are P-4 and Dell running XP Home, XP Pro with Simple File Sharing, or XP Pro ... P-4 has restrictanonymous set to "0" and there is no RestrictNullSessAccess ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: XP Pro Sharing problem
    ... Each of the shared folders is set up exactly the same ... Are P-4 and Dell running XP Home, XP Pro with Simple File Sharing, or XP Pro ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Update: A three hour tour....a three hour tour.....
    ... PC2 has folders on a second drive shared with Everyone having full control ... When I install NOD32 or AVG things go all to hell. ... PC1 cannot access any shared folders on PC2. ... I called Eset at 1-619-876-5400 after not hearing ANYTHING from their email ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • RE: change default directory for user shares
    ... at first please move Users Shared Folders to the destination partition ... Redirection will not work unless the Client Document Redirection task is ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Extender: sharing specific folders under my documents
    ... you are deleting the file from the database. ... adding the file back to the file system in your shared folders does ... > able to delete items from the extender (something I don’t want possible from ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)