Re: Need Help with RRAS
- From: "Bill Grant" <not.available@online>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:57:24 +1000
Good point, Phillip. It wouldn't be the first time we have seen problems
connecting to a remote access server in a DMZ which couldn't see the private
LAN, would it?
Phillip Windell wrote:
> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
> news:%23DP8qMWPFHA.3188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> I would manually configure the remote client to use your local
>> DNS (ie the one for your 192.168.8 network) in the connection
>> properties. To be able to resolve names by just using the machine
>> name, also set the domain suffix to the suffix of this network.
>
> Bill,
> If the Windows Server is running NAT then the 192.168.8 network won't
> be at all reachable. The 172.16.7 network is effectively a DMZ in a
> Back-toBack DMZ model, which is "untrusted" by the 192.168.8 network.
>
> If the Windows Server is not running NAT (just routing only) then it
> probably should only run one Nic since the 172.16.7 network is just a
> "useless appendage" sort of speak.
>
> I think he needs to clarify that when he gets back to make it more
> clear what is being dealt with.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need Help with RRAS
- From: \"1SE\"
- Re: Need Help with RRAS
- References:
- Need Help with RRAS
- From: \"1SE\"
- Re: Need Help with RRAS
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: Need Help with RRAS
- From: \"1SE\"
- Re: Need Help with RRAS
- From: Bill Grant
- Need Help with RRAS
- Prev by Date: Re: Can not logon cause physical address change
- Next by Date: Workgroups
- Previous by thread: Re: Need Help with RRAS
- Next by thread: Re: Need Help with RRAS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|