Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares
From: greg (Goo_at_tuxiecomputing.com)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Todd J Heron: "Re: Redirect web site on Private LAN"
- Previous message: Robert L [MS-MVP]: "Re: Cant access the Internet using Wless Routing"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Feb 2005 06:25:30 -0800
"Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message news:<#c7zUW4FFHA.392@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>...
> By default Windows 2003 will only restrict access allow anonymous
> enumeration of sam accounts. You might also want to enable the security
> option for do not allow anonymous enumeration of sam accounts and shares in
> Domain Controller Security Policy. Also make sure that you are indeed using
> a null session. You could verify that by going to the domain controller and
> using Computer Management looking at shared folders/sessions to see how the
> IPC$ connection is being authenticated.
>
Hello Steve,
Thanks,
I already have the following in both domain controller policy and
doamin policy.
Allow Anonymous SID/Name translation: DISABLED
Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts: ENABLED
Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts/Shares : ENABLED
Let everyone permissions apply to anonymous users: DISABLED
Which is why I cant understand what is happening here.
> While restricting access for anonymous access to sam/shares makes sense when
> it can be done it is part of security through obscurity. A properly
> configured firewall will not allow users from untrusted networks to use null
> sessions to enumerate user accounts/shares. Ultimately you need to rely on
> enforcing strong password policy in the network, share/ntfs permissions,
> group membership, user rights, the use of auditing, etc. to protect your
> recourses.
I could not agree more, Group policy protects all the workstations,
but the DC is a potential source of failure here. Teh firewall can be
tightened to prevent this happening. SP1 for 2003 is supposed to
implement the WinXP SP/2 firewall so we already have a rule set that
we can apply to the DC's then,
Thanks for your comments,
Dave.
- Next message: Todd J Heron: "Re: Redirect web site on Private LAN"
- Previous message: Robert L [MS-MVP]: "Re: Cant access the Internet using Wless Routing"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Anonymous Enumeration of accounts and shares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|