Re: network routing help
From: Param R. (pr_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]: "Re: Need a good hardware cluster solution"
- Previous message: Param R.: "Re: network routing help"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: network routing help"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: network routing help"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: network routing help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:51:59 -0600
Some of us dont have the luxury of simply abandoning the hardware investment
we have already made unless we absolutely have to.
thanks!
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:eC0szlF6EHA.3612@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> --------------
> Now the reason I started off with 2 subnets in the first place was because
> the SBS DHCP services likes to be in control over DHCP. As a result I
> could
> not have another device (WRT55AG) performing DHCP to wireless clients on
> the
> same subnet.
> --------------
>
> You don't have to run DHCP on either one, nothing is forcing you to do
> that.
> Just disable the one you don't need. The DHCP of the SBS is the most
> flexable. And you don't need two subnets. If you want two, then fine, but
> this isn't a reason to do so.
>
> -----------
> I need to maintain some sort of partitioning between wired and wireless
> clients because I also run a Proxy server on the SBS Box and I would like
> to
> govern
> -----------
>
> Again, not a reason to use subnets. The proxy is not "forced" to follow
> subnets. Also if this is the old MS Proxy2, it does not filter or
> restrict
> by IP#,...it works by user accounts. Don't confuse what you see in the
> Socks
> Service Permissions,...the Socks Service is primarily for Non-windows OS's
> and also requires the Application using it to be a "socksified
> application"
> which is extremely rare to find such an Application.
>
> Any other proxy should easily be able to work with a range of IP#s that
> are
> not directly tied to a subnet. You can pick arbitrary ranges,...after
> all,... they have to able to allow or deny within a system that might have
> only had one subnet to begin with.
>
> ---------------
> Server also. I just cannot do it on the wireless WRT55AG device.
> ---------------
>
> I'm not familiar with that device. Use a simple, regular Wireless
> Connection Point,...do *not* use a Wireless NAT Device which is what a
> so-called "wireless router" would be. The is the wrong type of device for
> the job.
>
> You are always miles ahead to never run a multihomed Domain
> Controller,..although SBS does seem to be an intended exception to the
> rule.
>
> 272294 - Active Directory Communication Fails on Multihomed Domain
> Controllers
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;272294
>
> 191611 - Symptoms of Multihomed Browsers
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;191611
>
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]: "Re: Need a good hardware cluster solution"
- Previous message: Param R.: "Re: network routing help"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: network routing help"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: network routing help"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: network routing help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
