Re: how to use more than on of my static IP's?
From: mmac (no_at_thank.you)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: Dmitry Duginov: "Re: File & printer sharing / WAN"
- Previous message: Pradeep: "Logging outbound traffic on a W3K router..."
- In reply to: Bill Grant: "Re: how to use more than on of my static IP's?"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: how to use more than on of my static IP's?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:35:53 -0800
Thank you, I'll go learn about address mapping now.
I would imagine that the SOHO line of routers wont support address mapping?
"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
news:%23GLUq16vEHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Address mapping and port forwarding are two quite different processes.
>
> With address mapping, all traffic arriving at the router addressed to a
> particular public IP is sent on to the corresponding private IP. With port
> forwarding, only traffic on a particular port is forwarded to the private
> IP. To do what you want, the router directly connected to the Internet
> needs to support address mapping.
>
> "mmac" <no@thank.you> wrote in message
> news:uk4anLuvEHA.3276@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> None are directly connected, all are behind a firewall, I have set
>> port "redirection" to certain machines.
>> For example, port 3379 of the WAN IP is set to go to the DC server for
>> terminal service access from anywhere. To reach another machine with TS I
>> have to first connect to the server, USe the web interface onthe server
>> to go into the firewall and change the machine that port 3379 is directed
>> to, which of course disconnects me when applied.
>> Then when I reconnect to the same WAN IP with TS, I connect to the
>> machine I set up just moments ago. But that leaves the first machine
>> locked out to all but admins because I didn't leave the Remote desktop
>> connection gracefully, I was yanked off when I changed the firewall
>> setting.
>> It works but it's a bit clunky. I would rather have another of my 12
>> WAN IP's go to a different machine. But the Netgear FVS318 doesn't allow
>> for mre than one WAN IP. And at another location I have a Cisco 2600
>> router and I don't think I can configure it for more that one WAN IP
>> either.
>>
>>
>> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
>> news:uAqVrVtvEHA.2192@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> What machine is directly connected to the Internet? If it is W2k/2003
>>> server, you can allocate your pool of registered IP addresses in
>>> RRAS/NAT. You can then map some or all of them to internal private IP
>>> addresses.
>>>
>>> "mmac" <no@thank.you> wrote in message
>>> news:eUkhv5pvEHA.1984@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>>> I have an internet connection that gives me 12 static IP's but I can
>>>> only figure out how to use one of them. There is only one connection to
>>>> the box from the provider. I would like to use one of the IP's for a
>>>> 192.168.1.x range and another for a 192.168.2.x and maybe another for a
>>>> 10.x.x.x range. See what I mean?
>>>> Now I would imagine a "router" would be used to split the different
>>>> IP's out but at another location I have a cisco 2600 connected to a T1
>>>> and with it I have only seen how to configure the serial (WAN?) port
>>>> for a single IP also.
>>>> What basic bit of info am I missing that would open this door to the
>>>> other IP's? Do I have to hub the ISP's connection and then run the hub
>>>> to different physical networks? I thouht I could have several different
>>>> ranges of IP addresses on a single set of wires. Maybe the cisco will
>>>> also do this but how do I start?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Dmitry Duginov: "Re: File & printer sharing / WAN"
- Previous message: Pradeep: "Logging outbound traffic on a W3K router..."
- In reply to: Bill Grant: "Re: how to use more than on of my static IP's?"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: how to use more than on of my static IP's?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
