Re: routing on Windows 2003 Standard

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Miha (miha.bernik_at_isg.si)
Date: 09/23/04


Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:47:45 +0200

H

Sorry to bother you, but finally we decided what to do.Only two network
cards, and just route between them (like Philip said route between two
normal subnets.)
First one will be connected to our LAN switch (IP of first NIC:
10.10.10.10/16) which will route through the second one that is connected to
firewall (IP of second NIC: 10.10.10.11/16; gateway 10.10.10.1 - IP of NIC
in firewall).
How do I need to configure RRAS to work with that?
Thank you again for all help
Regards
Miha

"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:ObUGMFOoEHA.3460@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> If you are doing just "routing" there is no such thing as a private and
> public card,..those concepts are strictly a NAT thing. You need to
> clarify
> if you are wanting to NAT between a trusted and untrusted network or are
> you
> simply wanting to route between two normal subnets, that is two entirely
> different concepts. RRAS can do either one, but they are not the same
> thing
> at all.
>
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
>
> "Miha" <miha.bernik@isg.si> wrote in message
> news:ePYcdCOoEHA.1712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> Thank you all for help. So if I'm getting this right, I need to configure
>> routing (RIP) from 'private' through 'public' card, and this can be done
>> with RRAS. Any help how to achieve this?
>>
>> Regards
>> Miha
>>
>> "Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
>> news:OlBjBNLoEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> > Alright...Bill and Jeff are saying opposite things <spank spank> let's
> get
>> > it together,..what'll it be guys ;-)
>> >
>> > Actually for me, the description was written too confusing, so I
>> > decided
>> > to
>> > just "lurk" and see what happened.
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
>> > www.wandtv.com
>> >
>> >
>> > "Miha" <miha.bernik@isg.si> wrote in message
>> > news:eWPnc9BoEHA.744@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> Is it possible to configure routing on 3 network cards, like 1 in
>> >> 'private
>> >> network' and 2 are in 'public network'
>> >> The situation is like: LAN - 'gateway server' - ClusterFirewall.(2
> nodes)
>> >> I want to do routing from LAN through first NIC on this 'gateway
> server'
>> > on
>> >> IP adress 10.10.10.1 through 2,3 NIC on the same gateway server on IP
>> > adress
>> >> 10.10.10.2 and 10.10.10.3 (these two NIC are connected to
>> >> ClusterFirewall,
>> >> which is connected to internet).
>> >> On 'gateway server' I need two card, becasue in case of working
> 'Firewall
>> > 1'
>> >> all traffic from lan and back will go through NIC 1 and 2 on 'gateway
>> >> server', but in case of working 'Firewall 2' traffic will go from lan
> and
>> >> back through NIC 1 and NIC3.
>> >> Is this possible?
>> >> Regards
>> >> Miha
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bridging network adapters in Linux
    ... ip addr add $address/$netbits dev br0 ... Either a default route ... two network devices assuming, ... This is done using the iptables mechanism. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: RRAS LAN to LAN
    ... I set up RRAS and NAT is not in the equation. ... and if I add a route add to a node on the 192.168.1.0 side I can ... netowork see anything on the 192.168.1.0 network??? ... mulithomed 2 NICs. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: RRAS LAN to LAN
    ... I set up RRAS and NAT is not in the equation. ... and if I add a route add to a node on the 192.168.1.0 side I can ... netowork see anything on the 192.168.1.0 network??? ... mulithomed 2 NICs. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • RE: ISA 2004 help please
    ... network, and I have set that as the gateway on those machines. ... When I set a persistant route on ... the server to their addresses (how I configured the ISA 2000 serverand they ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • [IPv6] PROBLEM? Network unreachable despite correct route
    ... I have several boxes with native IPv6 connectivity at various places. ... Some of them show symptoms of a lost default route for small periods of ... self built AMD Athlon64, Ubuntu Edgy, Distribution kernel ... At the same time, a sibling (same hardware, same switch, same network ...
    (Linux-Kernel)