Re: Connecting via remote
From: Glenn (glenn_at_rlbrews.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Previous message: Chad A. Lacy: "RE: Replace DNS with WINS - rhetorical hypothesis"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: Connecting via remote"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Connecting via remote"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Connecting via remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:22:07 -0600
My initlal and real problem is how to setup the branch users
to access Exchange mailbox and public folders without passing thru the frame
relay and without changing our ip addressing scheme.
Glenn
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:eeWaIYomEHA.3608@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Then the 56k Frame relay would be a bridged connection. We used to have
two
> here but are down to one. We use a "Nailed" 56k line to connect our "Press
> Office" in the State Capitol Building. Since it is the same subnet on
both
> ends there isn'at any routing involved, so in your case this is not a
> routing issue nor VPN as I mentioned earlier. Unfortuneately, I don't know
> what the root of your problem would be,...all I can say is that routing is
> not involved since there is no routing in the first place and VPN would
not
> be used in this type of situation.
>
> --
>
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
- Previous message: Chad A. Lacy: "RE: Replace DNS with WINS - rhetorical hypothesis"
- In reply to: Phillip Windell: "Re: Connecting via remote"
- Next in thread: Phillip Windell: "Re: Connecting via remote"
- Reply: Phillip Windell: "Re: Connecting via remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|