Re: Opportunistic Locking
From: Dave Patrick (mail_at_NoSpam.DSPatrick.com)
Date: 08/21/04
- Next message: Evan: "Domain Name Questions"
- Previous message: Todd J Heron: "Re: multiple DHCP in one network"
- Maybe in reply to: Terry: "Opportunistic Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:53:27 -0600
Terry,
Thanks very much for the update on this.
-- Regards, Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup. Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft MVP [Windows] http://www.microsoft.com/protect "Terry" wrote: | Hi Dave, | Just an update having got some support for an Act database corruption. Sage | Line100 (Dos program) and Act are both owned by Sage. The recommendation for | the Line100 program is to enable OpLocks on the client and server. The | recommendation for Act (other databases) is disable OpLocks on client and | server. Conflicting advice from Sage considering that they are intergrating | both products! | | Having made them aware of the issues they are now advising disabling OpLocks | on client and server for both products. Lets hope it works. I will find out | on Monday when I have had time to make all the necessary registry hacks and | rebooted the server. | | Regards
- Next message: Evan: "Domain Name Questions"
- Previous message: Todd J Heron: "Re: multiple DHCP in one network"
- Maybe in reply to: Terry: "Opportunistic Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|