Re: network performance problem win 2003
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 05/24/04
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: one server, 2 nics"
- In reply to: Thanx: "Re: network performance problem win 2003"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: network performance problem win 2003"
- Reply: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: network performance problem win 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:40:41 -0500
The purpose of my suggesting is to simply the evironment to eliminate any
aberations that "might" cause the problem. Once you get it down to the
simplest design possible with the least amount of oddities, the problem will
either go away, or at least have its cause narrowed down to fewer options.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com "Thanx" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:117b201c441be$4545cad0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > I know, I know, ;-) > > This is a test configuration. In a later phase both nics > will be connected to separate network segments. Connecting > both nics to the same hub should not influence performance > that much (I think). So why the performance problem. Where > should I start looking??? > > > > === testing is one... understanding is something else === > > > >Don't do that. Keep nics in different subnet *physically* > separated. You > >should share the same wire with multiple subnets only when > using VLANS, but > >when you are not using VLANs keep the Physical Layer > separate and distinct. >
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: one server, 2 nics"
- In reply to: Thanx: "Re: network performance problem win 2003"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: network performance problem win 2003"
- Reply: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: network performance problem win 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
