Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 04/29/04
- Previous message: Doug Sherman [MVP]: "Re: WINS Needed in 2000/2003 Domain?"
- In reply to: Sameer: "Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?"
- Next in thread: Sameer: "Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?"
- Reply: Sameer: "Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:44:38 -0500
"Sameer" <ssnewsfiles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e2ET1UiLEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> while i appreciate your response, i think you've missed the core issue.
the
I guess that wouldn't be the first time :-)
> core issue is getting the win2k3 server to route. everything else is
> working properly.
I don't see where it is supposed to router *to*. I only see in internal
network comming off the Int2 interface of the firewall. You can't route to
that one because that is where you are already at to begin with.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com
- Previous message: Doug Sherman [MVP]: "Re: WINS Needed in 2000/2003 Domain?"
- In reply to: Sameer: "Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?"
- Next in thread: Sameer: "Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?"
- Reply: Sameer: "Re: RAS through a VPN instead of dial-up?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|