Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 04/02/04
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Previous message: jjd228_at_NOSPAMoptonline.net: "update"
- In reply to: Matthew [MSFT]: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Next in thread: Matthew [MSFT]: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Reply: Matthew [MSFT]: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:54:10 -0600
"Matthew [MSFT]" <mfresoli@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O62FA7MGEHA.2732@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If the external adapter is chosen, or if this is set to allow RAS to chose
> the adapter, it should be changed to use the internal adapter (unless
there
> is a specific reason not to do so).
That confuses me more. Why wouldn't it be the external adapter since that is
the one the VPN users are connecting to?
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Previous message: jjd228_at_NOSPAMoptonline.net: "update"
- In reply to: Matthew [MSFT]: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Next in thread: Matthew [MSFT]: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Reply: Matthew [MSFT]: "Re: VERY frustrating 2000 server RRAS/VPN problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]