Re: DHCP Running out of addresses!

From: Dusty Harper {MS} (DHarper_at_Online.Microsoft.com)
Date: 03/30/04 

Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:49:37 -0800

You need to verify your routes. look at your route tables. Does your
default gateway have a route to each of your subnets? 

-- 
-- 
Dusty Harper
Microsoft Corporation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "AS IS", with NO warranties and confers NO rights
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Gary Youell" <gary@emmanuels.co.za> wrote in message
news:eALQOOlFEHA.3336@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Thanx Dusty,
>
> I did just that! Working 100%, however people who now acquire the 'new
> range' cannot browse the internet. Is this a router config issue?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Gary.
>
>
> "Dusty Harper {MS}" <DHarper@Online.Microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:e4oKgJxEEHA.3424@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > So what you'd do is:
> >      1) change your subnet mask to 255.255.255.0 and have a single
subnet
> > for all the machines and create a single scope,
> >      2)  put a router between the 2 subnets and relay the DHCP Discover
> > Packets.
> >      3) multihome your DHCP server on each subnet
> >
> > DHCP is a very simple service.  It will pull leases from its scope that
> > matches the IP Scheme of the interface the Discover is seen on unless
the
> > packet was relayed in which case it matches the scope closest resembling
> the
> > GiAddr field in the DHCP relayed packet.
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Dusty Harper
> > Microsoft Corporation
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > This posting is provided "AS IS", with NO warranties and confers NO
rights
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> >
> > "Gary Youell" <gary@emmanuels.co.za> wrote in message
> > news:uVWC1ewEEHA.1032@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > My DHCP is on a subnet of 255.255.255.128, and it provodes 128
> addresses,
> > > however, they are all used up!!
> > >
> > > We used to have two branches, each with 128 addresses, now on eclosed
> and
> > > moved in with us, and I'm short on addresses.
> > >
> > > Branch A had 172.168.16.1 up to 127, and branch B had 172.168.16.128
up
> to
> > > 254.
> > >
> > > Now in DHCP, I tried to add branch B range and activte it, however, it
> > does
> > > not get used!
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IP Masquerading
    ... Okay on DHCP. ... information for your subnet. ... ie what the default route and DNS is. ... Note that I run a local DNS ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Need help with DHCP Client & Name servers
    ... Your computer must be in the same subnet as your router's LAN side IP address. ... (anything outside your computer's subnet is sent to the default route, so the default route must be resolvable via ARP for your computer to be able to send packets to it. ... This gives a list of IPs and ethernet addresses that your computer has spoken to recently, and if you did get a DHCP dialogue going, your compuyer shoudl know the IP address of the DHCP server. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Multiple routes on LAN now I cant get DHCP addresses
    ... Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on ... Before we were able to use DHCP for this (DHCP was on an old 2000 server. ... LAN subnet: 10.10.8.x / 24 ... I used the Windows ROUTE comand (e.g. Route -p ADD 10.10.9.0 mask ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: DHCP serving more than one subnet (longish)
    ... > functionality we're looking for be obtained by running two DHCP servers (on ... No subnet information is present. ... As long as the clients have a route to the DHCP server before and after ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: HSRP and Policy Route
    ... You can see in your config that both ... routers think they are the local owner of the 5.1 subnet, ... now I am taking only default route from the ISP's but I guess if I ... of the subnet as you are saying that when Core 2 owns the 5.X network, ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
Quantcast