Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)
From: Carey (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: Jürgen Rudolph: "Delayed network access with Windows Server 2003 - long network response time"
- Previous message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Multiple Simultaneous Logons"
- In reply to: Bill Grant: "Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)"
- Next in thread: Carey: "Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)"
- Reply: Carey: "Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:29:27 -0800
Yes,
well my current setup is the client using the router as
the default gateway and have it do the work. BUT my boss
doesn't want another "hop" in the network. SO I have to
explain that it really isnt another hop because if the
router sees that a client wants to goto the internet then
it informs the client that it is on the local network and
doesn't actually get "routed" so technically its not
another hop and because the router is 10Base T he thinks
its a bottleneck. Well the only bottleneck would be the
traffic traversing the 10.0.0.0 - 172.16.0.0 network like
once a day. PLus the VLANS run at 100mbit so really there
is no bottlenecks within thier own VLANS.
If I am wrong here correct me please, but I believe what I
am doing now is the best setup.
>-----Original Message-----
> I am still not sure why you need to add this route on
each client. Surely
>your default router can handle this by redirecting the
traffic to the
>"other" router.
>
> It is better in the long run to keep the client setup
as simple as
>possible and let the routers do the routing.
>
>"Dusty Harper {MS}" <DHarper@Online.Microsoft.com> wrote
in message
>news:eEoug43EEHA.3812@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> You can configure the DHCP Scope option to hand out
additional routes.
>> These are given out through DHCPInform packets. The
options are 033 &
>249.
>> The clients have to support these options though
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Dusty Harper
>> Microsoft Corporation
>> --------------------------------------------------------
------------------
>--
>> This posting is provided "AS IS", with NO warranties
and confers NO rights
>> --------------------------------------------------------
------------------
>--
>>
>> <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:1428b01c41373$fc057780$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> > Ok I still need an answer to my original question...
>> >
>> > I need DHCP to supply a static route to the clients.
>> >
>> > Because in DOS, if I type route add 172.16.0.0 mask
>> > 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.4 255.255.255.0 it adds the
route and
>> > works fine. I need to deploy this through DHCP so all
>> > clients obtain this route.
>> >
>> > >-----Original Message-----
>> > >Nevermind I figured out the issue, I didn't have a
>> > default
>> > >route in the router.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>-----Original Message-----
>> > >>At a client site we are seperating the network for
>> > >>development purposes. This is being done using VLANS
>> > >which
>> > >>is no problem. I have configured a Cisco 1600
series to
>> > >>communicate between the VLANS. Which it does
properly.
>> > On
>> > >>the client machines they have the Internet
(10.0.0.1 for
>> > >>the Gateway) and will also access the Development
side
>> > >>through the router (10.0.0.4 as the development
GW). The
>> > >>problem is that the Intnernet and Development
>> > >>communication won't work at the same time.
>> > >>
>> > >>SO! For internet to work I need the default gateway
to
>> > be
>> > >>10.0.0.1 but cannot communicate to the development
side
>> > >>(172.16.0.X) and If I made the Default gateway
10.0.0.4
>> > I
>> > >>have communication to the dev side, but NOT the
internet
>> > >>anymore. So its one or the other and don't want to
work
>> > >in
>> > >>unison.
>> > >>
>> > >>SO! I've added the other router to the DHCP server
>> > >options
>> > >>(03) 10.0.0.1,10.0.0.25 and the clients renew these
>> > >>Gateways but I still have the same issue. If I
put .4
>> > >>first I get Dev but no net, if I put .1 first I get
net
>> > >>but no dev. What do I have to do to make them work
>> > >>together or route between them? Can DHCP publish
the new
>> > >>routes? I have setup Routing and Remote Access and
would
>> > >>be able to get it to work that way but we don't
want the
>> > >>server doing the work of the router. We want the
routers
>> > >>to determine what goes where...
>> > >>
>> > >>Any insight would be helpfull...
>> > >>I've also tried (33) Static Routes to no avail.
>> > >>
>> > >>Thanks
>> > >>.
>> > >>
>> > >.
>> > >
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Jürgen Rudolph: "Delayed network access with Windows Server 2003 - long network response time"
- Previous message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Multiple Simultaneous Logons"
- In reply to: Bill Grant: "Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)"
- Next in thread: Carey: "Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)"
- Reply: Carey: "Re: DHCP Server Options (Router)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
