Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 03/23/04
- Next message: J.C. Hornbeck [MSFT]: "Re: Server 2003 Admin Tools Needed"
- Previous message: Lamar Thomas: "Server 2003 Admin Tools Needed"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues"
- Reply: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:48:49 -0600
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:11e1e01c4106b$b1f7d210$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> (r)outer --> (F)irewall --> switch --> (S)erver & LAN
>
> one - one NAT goes like this
>
> Private Public
> 192.168.20.40 --> 123.123.123.1
Ok, that clears that up. If you aren't using it, get rid of old "public"
NIC in the server before that comes back and bites you in the rear. But
don't just yank the card out, Windows sometimes has problems with "ghost"
NICs left behind that won't remove. So uninstall the driver for it first so
that the NIC disappears from the system, then shut it down and remove the
NIC.
Option #1
---VPN
Done entirely at the Firewall,...nothing else will have anything to do with
it. Typically you must create user accounts on the firewall itself to
authenticate the users. It also usually has an "address pool" to assign to
incoming VPN callers. Make sure this doesn't duplicate any used addresses on
the system.
---RRAS
No longer has any purpose in life. There is nothing to use it for,...and
there is nothing to "route".
Option #2
There may be a way to "reverse-NAT" the incomming VPN to the Server's
internal IP# and have the RRAS handle the VPN, but I really don't know how
well that would work nor can I give any real advice or details on that. I'm
not even sure how RRAS will respond with only one NIC in the machine.
Option #3
Use two NICs in the Server and place it "side-by-side" with the Firewall
(like it used to be) and then the VPN users would connect directly to the
Server's External IP# and RRAS would handle the VPN. The Firewall would not
be involved in any way at all with this method.
Do *not* play "mix-and-match" with these methods, choose the one you want to
use and do only that.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com
- Next message: J.C. Hornbeck [MSFT]: "Re: Server 2003 Admin Tools Needed"
- Previous message: Lamar Thomas: "Server 2003 Admin Tools Needed"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues"
- Reply: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: 2k VPN/RAS issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|