Re: Windows 2003 server and Linux

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Eric Wood (ewood_at_NOSPAMmvncorp.com)
Date: 03/14/04 

Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 17:57:49 -0700

I am not sure I understand the comment....are you asking if I haved cached
mode turned on? I haven't changed any policies....it is just runnnig on the
Active directory v2003 defaults
"John Koswalski" <john.koswalski@perfectitsolutions.nl> wrote in message
news:uA0X#EVCEHA.240@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Have the clients (Windows 2000/XP is asume) "cached mode" enabled (deafult
> is 10 logins with cached quidentials)?
>
>
> "Eric Wood" <ewood@NOSPAMmvncorp.com> wrote in message
> news:#peHIDUCEHA.2628@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hello everyone...any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > I am running a Windows 2003 active directory over 9 different sites.
The
> > only thing that we are using the Windows server for are Policies
> (lockdown).
> > Each different site is connected via DLS using VPN. At the remote sites
> > they have linux machines that use SAMBA server. The only windows server
> is
> > at 1 location.
> >
> > The problem is that when the remote location's internet goes down (it is
> > unreliable) then the remote sites can't connect to their local linux
> > machines because "logon failure...no domain controller". The reason
this
> is
> > happening is obvious. I want to know how to stop it. I know that I can
> > load 2k server on one of the machines. The problem with that is that it
> > will run much slower.
> >
> > Is there any policy I can change to allow a windows box to connect to a
> > local unix share without verifying the password? Note that the linux
> > machine does NOT require a password...it is anonymous access.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciate. Please remove the NOSPAM from my email
> > address for a return.
> >
> > ewood@NOSPAMmvncorp.com
> >
> > Thank You
> >
> > Eric Wood
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Windows 2003 server and Linux
    ... only thing that we are using the Windows server for are Policies. ... they have linux machines that use SAMBA server. ... unreliable) then the remote sites can't connect to their local linux ... machines because "logon failure...no domain controller". ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Windows 2003 server and Linux
    ... > only thing that we are using the Windows server for are Policies ... > they have linux machines that use SAMBA server. ... > unreliable) then the remote sites can't connect to their local linux ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Windows XP Slow File Copy Performance
    ... files or single large files to Windows Server 2003 or a Linux NAS device. ... This slowness occurs on our local LAN as well as our WAN. ... We use QOS on our WAN for our VOIP phones, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Fedora the right choice?
    ... >easily get this going on a windows server which is what I do for a living. ... >But in an effort to force myself to learn and get more experience with Linux ... I am assuming if I install this OS minus the GUI ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Linux Faster Than Vista
    ... All of the Linux ... ensuring that operating system services do not interfere with application ... The point is that the Linux being used is a massively modified product from the desktop OS and the actual instances of this in use today and minuscule when compared to the use of the Windows server operating systems. ... I am not disputing that special purpose Linux implementation on supercomputer platforms can perform faster then Windows Server 2008 HPC system -the main issue is the pointlessness of holding up these special purpose Linux implementations and comparing them to Vista as per the title of the original post. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)